The Forum > General Discussion > Why not Turnbull?
Why not Turnbull?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Another load of no facts from comrade 579. Everything you say is tainted. During the Howard years nearly all the States were Labor fiefdoms. All of those states had record incomes….they were prosperous years. Every Labor state handed a monumental deficit to the incoming Coalition…….Where did the money go? Not on infrastructure and hospitals, not on education, but consultants, lobbyists, and an expanded public service, not to mention relatives and acolytes..
Comrade I would not crow about the fiscal finesse of Labor. Last month SA’s Labor government announced a deficit in 2013 that will be the largest in the state’s history. THE LARGEST IN HISTORY….JUST LIKE SWANS COMMONWEALTH DEBT….THE LARGEST IN HISTORY.
Your mob spent 20 BILLION on the education revolution a few years ago and our kids are the LEAST literate in the English speaking world.
You have the ineptitude to throw in a bleat about hospitals, when Gillard sends one BILLION overseas every month in interest payments.
579 old fruit, in my youth, long before OLO, the Sydney Domain on a Sunday afternoon was the place to swap political and social views mixed with vile and spittle. Those soap box debates were fiery. Why I tell you this is to point out that those orators were witty wordsmiths who could defend their position with substantial arguments and take on all comers.
You Comrade are an ideologue and you only make statements. You have no answer in any response, just another statement. Thank you for not burdening me directly with the regurgitated spin that you use for others….much appreciated mate….but I will continue to state facts pertaining to any spinny deceits you put forward.