The Forum > General Discussion > Why not Turnbull?
Why not Turnbull?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Page 30
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You ought to know that the AWU took its business away from Slater and Gordon in 1996 and gave it to Maurice Blackburn; and Roxon received the files from Gillard so knew all about Gillard’s problems.
Of course Roxon (and everyone else at Maurice Blackburn & Co.) read the files with glee, if only to get up to speed!
And you ought to know that is why Shorten hushed up the scandal to protect the AWU.
Was it a coincidence that Gillard announced the election date the day before police charged Craig Thomson?
As Thomson has been charged, is it not possible that Gillard will be charged for a far greater crime? Thomson only misapplied union funds, but Gillard has the moral culpability of treachery to her client as well as cheating you and your fellow workers out of about $1 million in funds.
If Gillard is charged, will the Vic Police ask Roxon to give evidence on the grounds that Maurice Blackburn & Co. hold the primary evidence?
Belly, don’t shoot the messenger.
Abbott will win and he will win because the rank and file workers of Australia will vote for him. Bob Menzies always recognised that it was the workers who voted him into power.
The ALP needs to get back to grass roots. You need more Curtins and Chifleys and fewer Rudds and Gillards.
If you want my gratuitous advice, Martin Ferguson is the most promising and genuine candidate on your team. He is more in the mould of Curtin than Rudd, Shorten, Gillard, Roxon or any others I have missed.
I am sorry that we are enemies because I firmly believe that you and I could argue the toss in the pub and reach some common ground.
Regards,
Geoffrey Kelley, Mount Eliza.