The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Queensland election., a referendum on the carbon tax.

Queensland election., a referendum on the carbon tax.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. Page 18
  10. 19
  11. 20
  12. 21
  13. ...
  14. 25
  15. 26
  16. 27
  17. All
I suppose the Labor Party will have the unmitigated gall to stand a candidate in the seat of South Brisbane. Regardless of any other consideration a person stands first and foremost with the expressed purpose of agreeing, baring accident or sickness, if elected to represent the good folk who put their trust in them, and those who didn't, for the life of the next parliament. Bligh has thumbed her nose at those who voted personally for her and is now doing a runner with a nice payout and some juicily lurks and perks.
If I was a voter in the up coming by-election I would put Labor last.
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 6:56:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Lexi,

With the liberals and nationals in a coalition, and a voluntary preference system, it made no sense to run against each other. Vote counting wise, it would also help Labor and the greens if they formed a coalition, but politically it would alienate the middle base that labor needs to govern.

BM,

"Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said Queensland voters had nominated trust in the government and the rising cost of living as their main concerns.

'Cost of living and the carbon tax are flip sides of the same coin,' Mr Abbott said, reiterating his promise to make the repeal of the carbon scheme his first priority, should he win government."

Q.E.D.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 7:37:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Spruiking rhetorical fear mongering spin, again, Shadow Minister?

Just because Tony Abbott says 1 + 1 = 3 does not make it so.

QED back at ya.
Posted by bonmot, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 9:47:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think that my son has raised a valid point.

I looked up the election results - and they were
given as - LNP 55.4 percent and ALP as 44.6 percent.
While in Ashgrove Kate Jones received - 9,406 votes
while Campbell Newman received 13,144. And as my son
pointed out if the LNP had not amalgamated - the results
would have been different. As he pointed out Anna Bligh
did retain her seat.
Posted by Lexi, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 10:24:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BM,

Read the opinion pieces, just about every commentator is saying something along the same lines, including ex labor power broker Graham Richardson. The polls show that just over 1/4 of voters want Labor.

To quote Peter Van Onselen,

"Today's Newspoll should end debate about whether Queensland Labor's problems extend to the federal party'

And from others:

"A DEEP and collective depression has taken hold of federal Labor, with the latest Newspoll suggesting the Gillard government faces a Queensland-style election rout with the loss of up to 37 seats."

If anyone thinks that things can change in 18 months, remember they were saying the same thing 12 months ago, and they haven't. Federal labor is following an almost identical trajectory in the polls that Queensland did. The old maxim, that madness is expecting things to change while continuing to do exactly the same.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 10:42:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We all know that polls are not exactly accurate and
don't tell the full story. They can be orchestrated
to achieve whatever results are necessary - depending
on the questions that are asked, and what sector of
the population is being asked those questions, and how
truthfully those questions are answered. We've had
the perfect example of this with the Republic Referendum.
No one should count their chickens before they hatch.
Posted by Lexi, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 10:48:05 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. Page 18
  10. 19
  11. 20
  12. 21
  13. ...
  14. 25
  15. 26
  16. 27
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy