One minute its profit destroying and now it's job destroying.
The Lady has substance, and the man has nothing.
Women and revenge are close to Tony's heart, if he has one.
A nice new MRRT, was born last night, for the betterment of the country.
A cost on carbon pollution, will kick start the green energy future.
We have a progressive govt;

Let us face it ,there is no substance in SMs claims.
I doubt he wants other than to muddy the waters.
Oakshots plan is not Labors over again.
It is all encompassing, within it every possible solution lays.
Abbott himself, in government must take one of the paths within it.
He would not dare turn the boats around.
He has both views,yes and no, and maybe on any issue.
579/Lexi, no joy for me here, but do not look for miracles.
In 1975 Labor, after years of press bigotry, and fools within the party, was thrown out on its ear.
ONLY a new leader, close to elections can save us.
I hurt, but self deception is just Ostrich it, burying our heads in the sand.
Far too many buy the propaganda, yes wake up after, and return Labor.
But only after defeat.
It is strange, silly, but true Abbott clings on to his job because the public see Gillard in no better light.
One falls both will.
Remember, never forget, some vote on newspaper headlines not truth.

Belly,

If you are an expert, Please tell us how the plan differs substantially from Labors original stripping of all rights bill.

I guess that the coalition will support it with the amendment that the country is a signatory to the UNHCR.

I want folk to understand and remember, not every post, mine included are right/true.
We fail ourselves, and the point we wish to make, if we let our words be nothing more than propaganda, an attempt to gift wrap our views and wishes.
It should be clear, in the bill, a proposal that is wide spread, not focused on the Malaysian solution only, exists.
AGAIN the proposal is,that membership of the Bali group.
A regional group of about 53 country's, set to resolve this issue.
Be enough to receive or send boat people, to country's agreeing to except them, under this regional agreement.
Offshore processing there.
Shadow Minister, now lays the UNHCR on me like a rock to the forehead, but did not tell us his turn around target country , is not a member of the UNHCR.
Was Nehru? SM? in Howard's days of using it?
IS it SM true the same folk who advised Gillard did so too for Howard?
And that they say it , post high court ruling will not work.
Australia be aware, it may seem silly but a massive pea and thimble con is being played.
Conservatives care little for policy's out comes truth, taking advantage of a hung Parliament,a not well liked leader they push and pull us away from looking at them.
And twist and turn every issue.
In the end, this country is about to elect a team of con men and spin experts.
And in doing so replace policy's far better than the few they have not based on NEGATIVITY.
Trust SM? no more than the greens trying to impose the views of not much more than one tenth of voters on us all!

Belly,

I thought so, Oakeshott's proposal has no legally enforceable human rights protections what so ever.

As far as turning the boats back, Australia has no responsibility for those that don't make it to Australian territory whether they are intercepted before leaving, or are turned back.

Patrolling another country's water boarder, provocative.
Human rights from an Abbott, see no evil person.
This noalition camp are taking the AU people as stupid.
Scare tactics are all they have.
No substance what so ever.
Turnbull would be a far better opposition, after getting rid of the abbott's and bishops.