The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Rob Oakshots Private Bill

Rob Oakshots Private Bill

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. Page 17
  10. 18
  11. All
Well done! you walked around that as if you feared getting it on your boots.
Nehru was not a signatory in your Pacific solution days, there said it for you.
What has changed.
No answer coming there, because it would, if honest prove the high court changed every thing.
Step back, take a few of your supporters with you.
Look at some post history, yours, but certainly worse your fellow travelers.
PLEASED?
As we roll toward your victory, are you, any thoughts about the slanders.
How about the torn fabric of our country.
Has it been worth the lies.
The fabrications, the non core promises?
QLD is my party's warning, even if mirrored, and without change it will be, by the federal election.
Conservatives will face such a day.
The death of honesty is going to be seen, bank on it.
Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 4:13:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nauru was not a signatory to the UNHCR.

Full marks for stating the obvious.

If the detention facility is fully run by Australians who are a signatory, then the status of the host nation is irrelevant, as recognized by the high court ruling.

The requirement for the host country to be a signatory is for those parties who wish to simply dump asylum seekers, not process them.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 6:30:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes but why are you not telling me the high court ruling has seen Nehru set to become a signatory?
No stirring, just truth, after your victory this issue and other back downs planned such as NBN will black your party.
Above all it questions voters who are uninterested in the truth, till it bites them.
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 1:56:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly,

Nauru was signed the charter before the high court ruling, early in 2011, just after Juliar said that she would not send anyone to a country that was not a signatory. (yet another lie) It was at the prompting of Scott Morrison and Tony Abbott so as not to give Juliar a feeble excuse.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 5:19:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I am aware of why and when it took place.
And have no better opinion of Gillard than you.
But Abbott would not like the truth to come out he is aware as are Morrison and you.
Without changes no offshore processing can take place.
Even now, if Gillard went, and she will, Abbott could fall on such an issue he is not an honest man.
I see your factory of propaganda News Corp is in more trouble.
Abbott may get a job there.
Posted by Belly, Thursday, 29 March 2012 5:15:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly,

"But Abbott would not like the truth to come out" Are you kidding? all of this is discussed every day.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Thursday, 29 March 2012 7:15:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. Page 17
  10. 18
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy