The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > 2012 - The So Called 'End Times'

2012 - The So Called 'End Times'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. All
in your own words..explain ya god gaps link
or explain the concept

thing is you got no first life genus
nor no second genus..the first 'evolved' from

and putting up survey..from the clever guy magazines...lol
how despirite

if you claim science..use the scientific nomoculture
use the right science words

like have you heard of mendel[a priest]
who revealed the mechanism mendalism
[as in mendelic inheritance]

he exposed the ressesive..versis dominant inheritors
just mendalism...a key biological tool..[refutes evolution]

but again..im talking to a guy who trusts other clever guys
cause it saves having to explain any science
it saves having to learn it

ie have faith..in the clever guys
guys and gal's..that ALSO didnt study science
yet developed faith in the sience peers

[just like the deluded..having faith
in the ritualised peers of the church..*and the state}

its usually decidedly clever
to back the clever guys

but if you cant expklain the science
ALL YA GOT IS FAITH

your trusting the science is fact
but its not even proper theory

bonnie..ol mate...one day one of your lot
will name the fitst genus..name the second genus[that the first may have 'evolved'..from..but till then

all ya got is a theo'suss..that
essentially is only the anti thesus..of
the god done it mob..trouble is both are only by faith

name 1st..name 2 de genus
make a science prediction
replicate...'the science'...to the prediction

in short make just one like it
use ya own dust and cell membrain

if you cant make the cell
you got bucklies making life
let alone evolving it..no matter how much ya spin it

ya got bucklies FAULSIFYABLE/proof
bucketloads of faith
in god i trust
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 19 January 2012 2:09:35 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
oh

and
'the catoholic church'...
supports evolution...

but that support..is wrong
[they took that stand on faith...lol..its easier to join the clever guys..than prove god did evolve every new genus[so we see the pattern..follow the path god led...[but will never create our own new genus..EVER*

but we wont live that long

BUT
our great grandkiddies..will know we were wrong

clearly god alone 'evolves'
as we ask him..for bodies
better suited to our true lusts

if you want to be..a beast
there is heaps of beasts/body forms..to chose from

so far mankind..is the highest
of the default..[material]..incarnations

but look...use your mind...

apes mutated
[lol]..evolved..into apes
[monkies into monkies

fleas into fleas..dog into dogs
for MILLIONS of years

then less than 100 milenia
[only one hundred thousand years
supposedly]...something far abouve the beasts 'evolved'..relitivly overnight

but in evolution terms
this highest pinacle..will dead end

so the devolution begins

[mate there is TWO THOUSAND..different mutations..difference..
between ape and you..

thats two thousand..individual changes[lol..eviloootions]..
that all need to get filterd past..the 'survival of the fat-test'[lol science survival test]

and ya got..*no clue
how it could be done overnight..[80/100 thousand years ago]

its such a joke...only the faithfull..will swallow the trickery
[thats why evoltion..is drummed into kids..before they dare ask too many questions

cause if nuthin..your posts reveal
ya got nuthin..

so teach/preach..ya faith..
[anti faith..knowing nuthin..of ya alternate [anti=god]..option

not even the basic beginnings[first life]
let alone the next 'evolution'...into lol..the next *new genus

in short by faith
[anti-faith in theo..creator]..
but by faith *alone..

[welcome to the science-fact free zone]
all science fact...lol..but no science methodoligy
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 19 January 2012 2:28:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG I respect your right to your views and beliefs, do not share them but as said your rights are clear.
Rather stay near the threads intended path.
I admit to researching the end times and predictions on the net for years.
Have a feeling we all do, we should look back too, at failed predictions, some are very funny.
Humanity has always needed to know if we can predict future and it may be linked to other belief not seemingly linked to reality.
But I believe SOME CAN see things others can not.
Almost half current predictions about this year,at least, are not related to Christianity.
Think we me here, over half the world are not Christians, so all faiths need to be researched about this year.
It is likely runner will be insulted but fact is those others are as human as us, every God I ever heard of says so.
Most online predictions say no end of the world, those that do are as believable as winning lotto without a ticket.
But look at predictions, Christian to Mother Shipton, about earth quakes floods and an end to the Catholic Church.
Who knows.
Any one recommend a good site?
Posted by Belly, Thursday, 19 January 2012 3:31:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
wiki is always a good starting point Belly

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

Gotta chuckle at Kasting's prediction given the current mêlée :)
Posted by bonmot, Thursday, 19 January 2012 4:05:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
One Under God
I cannot follow your posts.

Many people commenting seem unable to come to grips with the span of time this planet has been in existence and how that time span permits evolution and mutation to cause change.

At least 6 million years ago, Australopithecus afarensis existed. Two forces acted over time on afarensis, selection and mutation, and resulted about 4m years ago in A. africanus. Over the next 1.5m years the same processes resulted in Homo habilis, then H. ergaster followed by H. erectus, then H. heidelbergensis and ultimately about 100-150,000 years ago, us, H. sapiens.

The fossil records are quite adequate to verify that history. Somewhere well before A. afarensis his forefathers and the other great apes separated from a common ancestral line. Ages before that even earlier ancestors separated from the ancestral line that in time became monkeys.

If you have trouble with the time scale then examine the history of the structure of the Green River oil shale beds in the USA. These layered beds of vegetable matter and mud accumulated over 6 million years of continuous history.

The coal seams under Sydney, which extent over about 2000km, accumulated over about 30m years either side of 300 million years ago and are separated by various different other bands of deposited material including thick bands of volcanic ash.

All of this information is easy to find and to study. Science does not stand on feet of clay; it stands on verified evidence.
Posted by Foyle, Thursday, 19 January 2012 8:54:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
No evolutionist ever claimed that "we came from monkeys" - only that the indications are that we shared a common ancestor.

Like our food crops, every domesticated dog on the planet today for example, was created through deliberate cross-breeding starting from wolves over some centuries so I imagine random combinations plus mutations over millions of years could throw up vast variations on their own.

However I must also conclude that the Creationist version means that all the different races of humans were simultaneously "zapped into existence" and are all intentionally independent of each other. A pity then that we are so genetically identical with each other and have interbred.
Posted by rache, Thursday, 19 January 2012 9:43:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. 13
  15. 14
  16. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy