The Forum > General Discussion > 2012 - The So Called 'End Times'
2012 - The So Called 'End Times'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 4:13:09 PM
| |
I saw references to feeling sorry for such as runner.
He would be the first to say no need. Yet it is true haveing fallen for one of maybe a thousand God Myths he judges us harshly, forgetting his book tells him not to. It is by no means just Christian prophecy that names this year. In fact Mayans are not other than pagan, and it is the forecast they made that names now. Christians, branches of the main, have given dates for this , even last year selling every thing they owned. If we are forecasting based on likely hood Christianity may be replaced by another middle East faith. I base this only on current growth of one and shrinking of the other Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 4:21:56 PM
| |
great...bornmutt..has finally settled on the first life
""..single-cell amoeba""..[so this single cell mutated and became two cells..multi cellular] NAME WHAT IT IS what single 'cell'..genus mutated into what multicell genus for that matter..how did the cell membrain 'evolve' se ya still got nuthin..lol but there is more http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061027184123.htm """Amoebas are some of the closest..*single cell relatives of animals..so understanding..*how they work and evolve is important..because it helps us to understand..how animals evolve. We have developed8...lol..a new model lol..system for the study..of the evolution of forms. "We have written the dictionary. Now we know what the words are but we still have to construct..the sentences."...lol ""The research teams..were able to build the family tree..by amplifying and comparing highly conserved genes from..all known species of social amoeba. The existing family tree..of the social amoeba was based on how..the multi*cellular structures"" lol..single to multui-sell..lol ""of each species look on the outside. However,..this tree was completely uprooted by the molecular data...LOL..gathered by the researchers in Dundee and York. By plotting all existing information..of the amoebas’ cellular and multi-cellular shapes..*and behaviour...lol..to the molecular tree, it appeared that..increased cell specialization..and organism size is a major trend..in the evolution of social amoeba."" single cell amoeba ""Professor Schaap and her team..are now working to establish how the regulation..and function of genes..with important roles in development..was altered"" lol ""and elaborated..during the course of evolution to generate novel cell-types..and morphological features."" The next step..for Professor Baldauf..and her team will be to investigate the origin..of these amoebas,"" ie not FIRST LIFE ""and also to search..for new species"" cause there is no genus ""and to establish..their position on the family tree."" so not first life try again or present science proof ps good site... heaps of links lets just stick with facts [the science...not the assumptions] Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 4:44:38 PM
| |
*The only thing that shocks me is that grown adults are stupid enough to believe we came from monkeys.*
Whew runner, now you can relax, knowing that its not monkeys who are our closest relatives, but chimps and other primates. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 4:55:38 PM
| |
Great link, thanks!
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061027184123.htm Can just picture OUG scurrying off to google single-cell amoeba ... close to home I guess :) However OUG, they are talking about "social amoeba" - whereas some 'one' are from "anti-social amoeba". But you knew that. Posted by bonmot, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 4:56:44 PM
| |
This thread certainly has made interesting and enjoyable reading;a fascinating insight into the human condition.
Seems to me we have the standard two camps here. The science camp is saying, "Gimme the facts, Ma'am, just the facts." Meanwhile the - can I call it, the Believer's camp, is saying, "I believe what I believe and nothing anyone says will make me believe differently." I'm guessing the Americans and the Iranians will have a big squishy cuddle fest well before we reach consensus on this one :) Anthony http://www.observationpoint.com.au Posted by Anthonyve, Wednesday, 18 January 2012 5:16:26 PM
|
quote...""Evolutionary theory*..has now become
the underlying theory*...lol...""of all biology research""
ok give ya proofs
name one biology genus..that evolved into other genus
[its ok born mute dont know neither
biolol/research..""and,..since the discovery
of bacteria and viruses,..improved hygiene""
actually..that began prior to bacteria discovery
it was first thought to be..bad 'air'
[but heck..if you dont know better..
well ya just..dont know..
evolution/biol/diss virus/bacvteria...""and the development of vaccines,..antibiotic and other drugs..""
nothing but a strange joinder of concepts
but noting *micro evolution is making..them immune..
from current drugs..[this still isnt MACRO-evolution..[a *new genus needs]
DISCOVERIES,...""have saved and extended millions of lives.""
and not validated nnor used macro evolution to make even one NEW genus
broil goes on..""""Other developments..since modern science got underway..450 years ago has provided..more comfortable living for billions.""
not even climate related..let alone
relitive to gnosis..re evolution..[thesis..]
""Any changes..from now on..in evolutionary theory
will be minor adjustment only.""
oh i wish i could bet ya house on that
lol[but the insanity continues]
""Like the theories of gravity,"'
please by all means present the thesis..and the theory
and state the basic laws...before adjudging 'the theory valid
WHAT THEORY
be specific[these generalisations cant fool anyone READING what spion is being spun
ditto..""electricity,""
relates to evolution...how?
""mechanics and thermodynamics etc.,"'
yep clever general subjects
but where is thesis/theory..faulsifyables
that when refuted refute the theo-ry
""evolutionary theory..is now
almost written in stone.""
great
state..its thesis...definatly state ya theory
what is the faulsifyables...[as per anthonynes quoted definitions]
YA GOT NUTHIN
no name...no genus evolving
and all ya got is phenotypical stone fossils
that can*not..show genomic genus change...[without genes..ya cant prove relation
[its relitives..changing genus..
via small mutations..that you claim..in ya theory]
stone dont got no genes[even then stones are fragments..bits of bits]
If anyone..has have any evidence
to faulsify..*the THEORY
they should produce it..
rather than babble on
using generalities..
""of people
who understood little.""
foiled..the foyle's feeble foibles failed