The Forum > General Discussion > 2012 - The So Called 'End Times'
2012 - The So Called 'End Times'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Friday, 20 January 2012 9:12:55 AM
| |
ok OUG the answer is no thanks, no God no last minute conversion just in case.
No education to fear. A test this subject is of interest to me, in truth I feel to many. UTube shows hits in the hundreds of thousands on this subject, after any major event books on the subject fly out of stock. How have similarity's in predicted events and likely events come together in this year. No prediction but likely events seem to be. Big conflict in the middle east soon, we are haveing more volcanoes and earth quakes so more are likely. Tsunami as a result? yep. World finances could over night fail, what then. Will China and India be benevolent on taking the worlds largest economy and in Chinas case armed forces? This OUG uneducated person knows one truth, you can bank on it, no God will save us from our selves. No God ever,was invented for reasons other than control. If I could invent my own heaven true, and know it would be mine always. It would not be on my knees at the feet of a small brown man off middle eastern appearance being eternally nice. I would with no further consideration take this country this life ;lumps bumps faults and all. Think about the things we could learn while your knees wore out. Posted by Belly, Friday, 20 January 2012 2:46:15 PM
| |
I for one simply adore UOG's posts.
They make no sense whatsoever, but they're so damned entertaining. Anthony http://www.observationpoint.com.au Posted by Anthonyve, Friday, 20 January 2012 6:49:37 PM
| |
david f,
Because it has no deity, Buddhism is technically not a religion - just a belief system, albeit with ceremony and ritual. It's a religion in the same sense that baldness is a hair colour and not collecting stamps is a hobby. However it doesn't make it immune from violent practices. Even the Dalai Lama has a reputation for oppressing rival groups and is even more homophobic than the Pope. Another thing all religions have in common is that they are all based on a fear of death and offer some sort of eternal existence - otherwise they are inherently worthless. The eager notion of some sort of pending final apocalypse as a justification and resolution of belief seems more like the result of impatience than enlightenment. Posted by rache, Friday, 20 January 2012 8:59:22 PM
| |
*They make no sense whatsoever, but they're so damned entertaining.*
Sheesh, don't encourage him, the OLO walls are already plastered with his rants. I tend to scroll past most of them, but I guess for him its like psychiatric therapy. Right now its back to the old genus rant. OUG still doesen't get it that genus is simply a human construct for classification. At the end of the day, all living things share genes, dna etc, so all living things are related, much to the disgust of the religious, some of who think that we humans are related to angels, rather then pigs, goats, primates and all the rest Posted by Yabby, Friday, 20 January 2012 9:03:02 PM
| |
Dear Rache,
Buddhism is a non-theistic religion. Religions do not have to incorporate a deity. You are defining religion in terms of the religion you are familiar with. It is not essential that a religion incorporate belief in a deity. Posted by david f, Friday, 20 January 2012 9:18:52 PM
|
a ressesive..may survive
but then most resessives..are also self destructing
when..re-combined..with the same*error..
[see that curerntly..most/science
is study of death..not life]
think why..you cant quote..*living dna
proof..of evolution
*cause it isnt there!
[we done the whole humane genome
and proof of ape decent=nil..!]
heck mate..we share 50%..of our dna
with a bannana...[genes are such sticky/tricky things]
thus your peers avoid genes...cause..[they]..like mendalism
refute ya theory..too]
""the different/races""'
is from when noah.'s sons..and their wives
spread out of afrika..*..
were related
cause they are from one..paternal line[noahs]
[and a few divergent..old matriarchal lines]
so yes huhmans interbreed
but to validate..ya theory
ya need to fertilise..*an ape
get it yet?
""super-bugs that have become drug-resistant."""
yep micro_evolution..[within its genus!]
noting that the genus..*hasnt changed!
thus that MIRCO evolution within_the_genus
cant validate genus_evolution[macro/evolution..INTO..*NEW GENUS
lol..why so many clever diss-believers
who dont know science lord
""Tuberculosis bacteria""
again all staying within their genera[lol]
""They didn't exist..a year ago;now they do.""
they individually didnt..BUT..*THEIR GENUS DID..!
""a perfect example/of adaptation""
yep not macro/evolution/genus
yes..its micro evolution..within*..the SAME GENUS
""by natural/selection""
not really..there is a dude..often comes into these topics
some educator...who breeds bacteria resistance..for students
*but each surviver..is
the *same genus..ya genious
here is a docter[peer]....teaching other 'docters'
to make resistant bacteria..[to make a spuriolous point re MICRO evolution within..lol..genus
[WERE GETTING SICK..FROM NUTTERRS LIKE THAT]
just trying to validate a lie
""It's insane/to deny evolution;""
i dont deney MICRO EVOLUTION..[within its family genus]
but macro..thats delusion..
even 4 of ya in a row,,got no idea..of
what ya theory..is really*..saying
GENUS EVollolvING..INTO..*NEW GENUS*
not one proof of that..EVER happening
not once
not ever...no recorded/reported/known
evolving..*into new genus..EVER
got it?
MICRO-evolution..[within genus
""it's happening all around you,..every minute of every day.""
yes it is
BUT EVOLUTION..[the theory],..is about...*new genus
appearing by micro evolution's..of species
[if..only...you really could grasp
how insane that is]
genus bounds..*prevent this happening
cause genus bounds were found..when breeding failed..!
it's..in its own defintions..fixed firmly..
no breed-ability..=*..different genus..
but ya got no proof
again..lol
cause even ya peers
got no proof..![never]