The Forum > General Discussion > Nanny State?
Nanny State?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
For it to be of use it has to limit require some kind of registration, proof of identity etc by all users.
From the clubs perspective there is an assumption that a lot of casual users won't bother.
It's not going to cover all means of actual gambling so there are plenty of alternatives available for problem gamblers when the urge takes them and they've reached a limit on the pokies.
I would support changes to laws around use of substances by adults to take most of the underworld aspects out of the transaction as well as reduce the risks associated with contaminated products. I'm quite in favor of heavy penalties for bad choices involving the use of substances (if you drive under the influence you put the lives of others at risk).
Prohibition rarely works, it's a tool for creating opportunities for criminals and fosters an environment of lack of personal responsibility for choices.
R0bert