It is somewhat interesting when an atheist like Soros compares his actions with that of a god. One immediately wonders what that might entail.

Fortunately, he is kind enough to tell us.

"I fancied myself as some kind of god or an economic reformer like Keynes, or, even better, like Einstein."

Clearly he considers that economic reformers and brilliant physicists exhibit god-like qualities. So, no danger there to anyone, obviously, since both categories are entirely populated by human beings, as opposed to anything having supernatural powers.

So, to answer your original questions, Boaz:

1/ Who is he?

Soros? He's just this guy, you know...

2/ If such a man could (and did) break the Bank of England....would you worry about his plans for you ?

Fortunately he can't, and didn't. He placed a large bet against sterling and won. You could have done the same thing, don't forget.

The Bank, you will notice, remains unbroken to this day.

In any event, I doubt very much that he has any plans for me. He's just this guy, you know...

3/ If such a man could orchestrate the Asian financial meltdown, does he have too much power? (this is alledged by former PM Mahathir)

Fortunately, he couldn't, and didn't, despite what Dr Mahathir might have wanted you to believe back then. The good doctor did, of course, withdraw his remarks, once he realized that no-one in their right mind believed a word that he was saying.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s1812946.htm

But you are never very strong on facts, are you Boaz.

4/ Should he be stopped?

Stopped doing what? Be specific, for a change.

5/ If yes, How and by whom?

Until you can say what you want him to stop doing, you can't say how it would happen. And if you can't say how, you won't be able to identify a "whom".

So you can rest easy in your bed, Boaz, the bogeyman is not coming to get you.

And now that it is all out in the open, Boaz, can you provide references to this statement of yours:

>>According to an executive from the organization of the man concerned, in a meeting with an executive of a Media organization they are trying to silence...and in response to the answer to the question "Why? are you doing this? (exposing this man- The answer being "because you are trying to form a global government" said: "That ship has already sailed" indicating a very high degree of confidence in their position.<<

Context being everything.

And accuracy, of course. Don't forget accuracy.

how do we fix it..?
bring back..HONEST MONEY..[coin]..and buy back the fed..with 12 coins

[one for each of the banks]..total=44.4 billion

things have gone strangly distorted...we have the sovereigns-head..on coin..[i think it was to assure the quality of the coin's content...
in sovereign*..assured weights..and quality...of copper..silver..or gold

[without knowing the real answers...how can be achieve a fair solution..in the ongoing..[upcomming?]..money crisis?

till honest*values..are restored*...to the proper*authority..
how can we get a fair*solution..to this..now global disaster...[maybe]..unfolding as we speak..

lets ask if the constitution..has any answer

chapter 5/115..says...'STATES..shall not coin money
NOR make anything...but gold/silver coin*..a legal tender..in payment of debts'

but..what about..copper[the poor-mans gold]
we lost copper-coins..because they contained..[cost]..4 cents in copper..to make..thus we got rounding-up...and rounding.down...but is it theft...both ways?

see how these things..*creep up ..and..
in doing so..cause huge-problems?

it is no secret..govt..needs..TO*lend..ITS own money..from bankers
[and we know..what bankers did..with this]

but here..is the cure..
.restore..legal_tender's..TRUE_*values

[bank-bills true value..is arround..7 cents
[the true-cost..of printing..and manufacture]

but the true value..of a one cent=5 cents..
so lets*..let one cent=one dollar

then do the math...and return back to..the only constitutionally legal tender..we got..[for paying off personal-debt]

let the banks..still do..as the banks do
but..let the people pay-off..THEIR*debt..in coin..[at true-values]

[at the rate of..one cent...equals one dollar]..two cents.equals 2 dollars...50 cent=50$..and 2dollar coin-200$...

[all wage and govt services..payed-out..get payed..in coin]

and credit..gets repaid in credit
and fiat-bills..in bank bills

what ya think?

nickle..isnt*silver*..
even the gold*coin..isnt gold
but a bank-note..is paper[ok plastic]
...and cyber credit..is not..a solid gold..promise..only ursurous-debt

lets discuss does.. one cent=one $100..[fiat dollars]..?
recall when..ussr went bust..the*people..got shares

well..now the capitalists..are going nuts...
lets get our pay...in coin...ursury free..!

who owns the mint
indeed who tells the mint to print..coin?

even who issues bank-bills?
and who creates credit?

Al
What do you mean by Conservative? Being far right does not mean Conservative necessarily unless that is the norm. A Communist can be a Conservative if that is the status quo.

But I get your point. Your agenda appears (correct me if I am wrong) to ignore the positive aspects of any program that appears on the face of it, to be 'socialist' when it serves a collective good and paid for by the collective. For example universal health care, education etal.

As you mentioned the problem is really with GREED but unfortunately many people see those on minimum income asking for higher wages as Greed while ignoring real greed at the top end.

Often it is about keeping up with the cost of living that drives a plea for higher wages. That is not the same as expecting something for nothing as often low paid workers like cleaners work very hard with unreasonable targets to meet on shift - many not being paid overtime.

Greed means the workers don't get paid fairly and the clients get shoddy value for money while the emphasis is skewed towards higher profits at any cost. We are losing sight of what can simply be described as a diminishing sense of 'honour' in business dealings which comes down to old fashioned values of courtesy and respect.

Does any body else find it funny that one power crazy control freak in Murdoch, who is completely consumed by the obsession to control public opinion through manipulation in the media is trying to take down a kindred spirit.
I wonder what the real motivation is, When did Soros cross Murdoch or what deal went bad?
Either way i have no trust in any of them at that end of business, greed and crazed minds prevail over the common good.
And what is sinister about telling us that the boat has sailed on a shadow world government. The innuendo that there are 7 families that really run the world is as old as the hills. Didn't realise that anyone really disagreed with the basic premise of this. After all it is pretty clear from events that our governments sure don't run the countries.

10/11/10 pts 1,2&3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qn2orMCZqgQ&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6PhdzhMv6w&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Y5lBXZjuM&feature=player_embedded