...Continued

<<shep bred sheep...pigeons breed pigeons...bacteria breed bacteria[virus makes other virus]>>

Absolutely! And over time, they change depending on their environment.

<<..there is NOT ever been observed any not like its parent...>>

Hole in one again. And evolution doesn’t claim otherwise.

<<[no lion has ever bred a whale]..EVER>>

And nor would it. Such an occurrence would disprove evolution.

<<the so called fossil evidence..has HUGE GAPS>>

Yes, and so does the collection of photos taken throughout your life. But there would still be enough to determine that it was you in those photos.

<<besides it only COMPARES..looks like..with looks like>>

Yes, while applying our knowledge of different traits in different species that we observe consistently.

<<[dna simply speaking isnt there to prove their theory]>>

No, it’s not there to prove evolution. But it’s certainly good evidence of common decent.

<<but look at the so called tre..of life..its full of gaps too>>

Whoa! Look at the gaps! Look at the gaps!

That’s all you people can do, isn’t it. You have no idea of what gaps you’re even talking about.

Thanks for the links too, OUG, but I read them as they were happening and it’s the same old thing, over and over, with you making the same ridiculous claims you’ve just made now while others correct you.

But you just don’t get it, and you never will.

aj/qote..<<So,because..our writings prove..that we..(demonstrable beings..that we know exist)exist,>>

words dont assemble themselves
just as the bodies actions cannot...assemble themselves

thus we get dna...needs to be divided into rna..that then joins with other..bits and pieces..to make proteins..etc

that science can make dna...[lol...what you want a wow?
dosnt make the cell membrane...nor the 20 other steps..NEEDED,,to make a signle cell

yes you can fob off children..with automatic reflex..
but the actions of a signle cell...in one second..is more than a super-computer can follow..let alone achieve

and the best science can offer is it happend by chance
just like these*..words..just happend to assemble..*THEMSELVES...lol

<<The difference between our writings..and the universe is that there are laws of science..>>laws..made from watching..how god does it

laws..<<that explain how matter and chemicals arrange themselves>>
ok clever guy/spokesperson..explain how the first life was made

common..you claim science..reveal ANYONE..
who has made..*just one single cell
NO ONE HAS..ever..

in previous topics i have explained the odds have more zero-s...in it
than there are grains of sand in the universe..[some clever guy tried top rebut it by saying every second..halves the odds

YET THE FACT REMAINS
man has no idea,...HOW IT WAS DONE...nor can it do it even today..with or without the help of a god,

<<..there are no laws of science..that explain how letters arrange themselves..to consistently make sense.>>.rubbish..there are laws of grammer[so im told]..but even ignoring the LAWS of words..there still needs to be logic in your mind to make sense of them

and that logic comes from god..no god no logic
[no nothing]...

till we[YOU]..can demonstraight*/replicate...it..
its a theory*

everything..HAS A CAUSE
why would life..be the ONLY EXCEPTION?
[life/logic/sustained by the light...into love]

if you KNOW how god done it
explain it here/now

name the first life...name what it evolved into
prove it with science..dna...etc...then DO IT..!

you cant..because..someone LIED TO YOU

aj/quote..<<<<[no lion has ever bred a whale]..EVER..And nor would it...Such an occurrence would disprove evolution...>>

lets quote from wikipedia

<<The traditional theory of cetacean evolution..was that whales were related to the mesonychids,..an extinct order of carnivorous ungulates..(hoofed animals),..which looked rather like wolves..with hooves..and were a sister group of artiodactyls.>>

its all delusion

here is some more

,< The pakicetids are hoofed-mammals that are sometimes classified as the earliest whales.[2][3] They lived in the early Eocene, around 53 million years ago. They looked rather like dogs with hoofed feet and long, thick tails. They have been linked to whales by their ears: the structure of the auditory bulla is formed from the ectotympanic bone only. The shape of the ear region in Pakicetus is highly unusual and only resembles the skulls of whales. The feature is diagnostic for cetaceans and is found in no other species. It was initially thought that the ears of Pakicetus were adapted for underwater hearing, but, as would be expected from the anatomy of the rest of this creature, the ears of Pakicetus are specialized for hearing on land,..and *if* Pakicetus is related to the ancestors of whales,..underwater hearing must have been a later adaptation.[4]

According to Thewissen, the teeth of Pakicetus also resemble the teeth of fossil whales, being less like a dog's incisors, with a serrated triangular shape, similar to a shark's tooth, which is another link to more modern whales.[5]


Reconstruction of Indohyus...Thewissen has since found the same ear structure in fossils of a small deer-like creature,>>

see how its all delusion?
your swallowing others delusions
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=whale+evolved+from&aq=f&aqi=g1g-m1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

bah im over arquing

PRESENT YOUR CASE
reply previous question

life began from.....!
then evolved into...!

my proof is....!

here is where i documentated my search for the gaps last time

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=184&t=3225&start=60

there is still no rebuttal's

on this page i rebut ya ape theory

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=184&t=3225&start=70

and whale evolution...lol
thats coverd too

realise if you cant explain
someone lied to you

why...to remove god from the picture
so demons can rule over a godless hoard of athiests

if you lot want to dismiss god from the picture
then at least have proof..!

present it

[oh looked at ya link...
please reveal where it reveals there is no god]

go back to my link to ya tree of life
go look at the roots...they dont hook up into the tree
and most of the branches dont hook up to the tree..neither

the latest thinking from ya godheads..
is a forrest of life..not a tree..lol

realise you been conned

present proof

I am not sure if I missed it, but I would be very interested to hear something (should you choose to share of course) about your O.B.E. (O.ut (of) B.ody E.xperience)) *Philo*

..

(My 1st post since back from "suspension." I can but say that I felt reasonabley sure that judgement would come upon me and that I would be found wanting at the time, HOWEVER, the temptation to do a *Monty Python* on *GrahamY* was simply too powerful to resist.

;-)

dream on ..out of body is subjective..[rather than objective]
our mind can imagine anything...

much of the stuff
i have been posting is..*from out of body...messengers

the key seems to be..in ability to verify..the info obtained

[if it cant be confirmed..its likely to be the same believability as a dream..[no pun intended]

anyhow lets hope someone can suggest some relevant info
but for now i filter beliervability with stuff that is good...[rather than giving credance to the negative]

if its good for all
and they dont want money or credit..or anything else..*from me
i give it some belief...if i have a lot of trust..then i quote it

sorry..but thats the best i can give