"SUSS?..quote..<<It>..evolution..<<..has hypothesis,..but..it is only guesses..at/this-stage.>>.."

No actually, that's a lie on your behalf, you have reworded and quote mined what I said and putting the word evolution in there. I was not referring to evolution, but abiogenesis, the beginning of life. I have asked you for your evidence, as you are making the claim. You have then based your whole post on disparaging something I was not saying.

Even if evolution was proven to be false, it would not therefore justify your claims. I am asking that you provide evidence for claims that you are saying are true. At the moment, all you are doing is trying to shoot down evidence, while not providing any for your position.

You have not answered the question OUG, all you do is spew invective. Rather than basing your whole position on calling people names, please put forward the evidence for your position, that outshines the evidence for evolution, and outshines the evidence for abiogenesis we are seeing.

I am not trying to take sides, I want to weigh the evidence and come to a decision based on that. So far, you are not providing any evidence, you are just pointing at gaps in knowledge, and stating that your god is there, but providing nothing to justify that.

Please provide the evidence of your position that your god created everything.

OUG,

If you genuinely find it hard to write using traditional paragraphs and sentences, why not attempt a few drafts offline, say in Word, before posting on OLO, so, the rest of us read your considered ideas? Or, you could have like-minded friend help you? We, I am sure, would prefer a read a reply one can understand after a day or two, rather than nonsense within the hour.

Will you answer the questions posed or admit you cannot?

I think it might be time to stop baiting the poor boy.

His last two posts both topped the 600 word mark, a sure sign that he has nothing left to say. (It's far more productive to let Open Office count them, by the way, than have to read them)

If you carry on goading him like this, he'll do himself an injury.

Meanwhile, it's not surprising the servers keep cracking under the strain.

THE SUSS/davidian....PER-RIDICCULE'..o=liver...are the winners/..whiners...lol

they couldnt..present proof..so have resorted..to other tactic

so too/will i

is your dorkins.. god-head...taking questions
..having any debate

invite/the retard HERE..[forum]..to debate evolution

my proof?...it needs..your/names..
so it makes sence/...to you...lol..

but..you dont even/got names..[only..con-cepts and theories
and..one-of ya...can count..using a..lol..machine...lol

look mummy...lol..i can count...lol
welcome to..the athiest/nut-house

so lets explain/lol/badly

glint=reflected light..from god/..light..[observing it]
the/glint is the ab/gensis/cell...1 st life..your searching for

..look inside..this cell..to look upon gods/face

but now..lets reveal what god saw..in the glint of his eye...in the cell..[glint..

his own reflection

he saw the light...formed..into a cellform...
but the caUSE OF THE glint..=..the alpha/.......
SCIENCE NEED LOOK..TO A nucleus/FREEcell...

WHAT..is the first living/cell..[name it]

as it was gods..first look at self/cellf..
we can forgive him..not revealing..
the fullness...of his true self...

a plumb..[engorged/breast-like...cell]

..with an abundant..centered..[engorged/mipple]..center..ie a/cell/nucleus...little wonder..the holy men dared not look upon..his lush greatness,..

face to face..so to speak..lol

these..wholy/-men/-woe-men..were truelly holy...
but such too..this un-nam-able..which remains..this first life
that so evaded science...

were ye of enough faith..science could create one..in a second
by revealing..their own inner light

but such is not to be

anyhow..see the glint..in your own eye
see gods circles everywhere...earth is round..
like the breast/god/...so its reflection..the/cell...
universe like an ameoba..etc..even rain drops..eggs..cells/ovums..life..comes from

have you never watched..the new bodied.spirit...[babies]..
so passionatly consuming..from the mothers joy/bags...recieving their nurture..as if the plump cell..like bvreast were good/..god himself

unhesitatingly greedly gulping..good/of god...in his fullness/..as if to smother the light...they swarm/smother..their mother's/breast..

cause of the light/within..see previous post....i dare say..they..then/yet see..the light source..[0].but i cast pearl before the swine...

[i]..going to those..who reject gods-love/light/life..being outcast from my living/own...i have the darkness..in me...

but also know..
you have the light...within you..
too...its no shame to be decieved
but it is to decieve...

and i am in a nest of vipers/decievers

the decievers decieving..ONLY..each other/
their/place/room..is a badd deceitfull/place..

but dont say..you wernt told..
seek to love truth/love/life...

love god..by loving neighbour
trust god...by faith..in good

find truth...by living truth

get proof...

by giving ..proof

all you pond-scum..going to mal-borne...
how ironicly iconic...lol

good riddance

OUG I have provided evidence for evolution, with evidence for macroevolution and the fact speciation occurs. You agree that evolution occurs, but only to the point of genus, and state that it cannot, over time, create new 'genus' (which it has done in the past, but lets ignore that for a moment as you are unable to comprehend that genus is just a name that encompasses all resulting speciation events) but have not provided evidence as to what 'stops' speciation from continuing into further and further divergence.

You have not provided any evidence for your claims that your god created life, and refuse too.

This leaves us with the fact you cannot provide evidence for your claims at all, and all you can do, is just state that speciation events cannot lead to further divergence, and also without any evidence.

Any observer can see there is more evidence been put forward from science, than any evidence you have put forward, which is a big fat ZERO.

So all you are doing is flaming in your posts, nothing more.

Stop the flaming, and provide some evidence for your claims, or admit that you have no evidence to put forward, which leaves you in the position that everything you are saying, directly relates to your own position.

ironic ... and hypocrisy.

Faith is one thing, but to flame others stating they are not providing good enough evidence for their claims and using derogatory wording in doing so, when you provide none yourself, is kinda lame.

Pericles,

Agreed. Perhaps we might have to accept that if we paint OUG into a corner, he could short circuit. I wouldn't want that to happen.

OUG,

Thanks. We might be able to continue our debate on another occasion.

Cheers,

O.