suss1...your rebuttals
visit the transcript
no id needed
http://www.peacetakescourage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=11077&p=82373#p82373

i will create my summations when next i get posting limit

cant be bothered as you did present no evidence
please present your evidence
three days to do it here or there

over to you/or whoever ya can get to rebut that evidence

or dares present theirs///it goes to you tube next
then answers and some other sites..then goes to europe

make sure you got a jury seat

http://www.peacetakescourage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=11077&p=82373#p82373

anyhow thats my first posts gone
see you at the links

please provide your evidences this goes to bbc /abc/etc in three days

this athiest meeting in mal-born...is going to be huge
get the media going...your goung to swamp malbourne with the athiest elete

I have already all through the thread posted links to evidence and have discussed it over an over OUG.

But that's beside the point. You don't have any evidence, so all your wailing about 'providing evidence' really goes to show how much of a hypocrite you are.

You require that your claims do not need evidence, while everyone elses does.

Hypocrisy, plain and simple. All your blustering about 'trials' etc is a joke, you would be thrown out of court for lack of any evidence.

I call it a kangaroo court, as you fail to give any evidence before proceedings, you have defined timelines and everything, what a joke :) You are rushing some joke court case thru on your own whim, and I am not subservient to you, however much you wish to be master of your own insane asylum :)

crazy hehehe what do I care what you think OUG enough to even bother just repeating the evidence for evolution that makes up current scientific thought? I've put it forward already.

Where's your evidence that your god created everything?

Until you can show testable, falsifiable evidence, your 'trial' is just a joke.

I think it may already be too late, Oliver

>>Perhaps we might have to accept that if we paint OUG into a corner, he could short circuit. I wouldn't want that to happen.<<

The thread he started this morning on World Freeman Society is already close to 26,000 words long, consisting almost exclusively of posts from this forum.

It makes even less sense over there than it does here, if that were possible.

He may well have cracked. I'm going to leave him to it, I'd hate to knowingly contribute to a breakdown.

Oneundergod, if you haven't convinced the heathen rabble
on this site of the perils of atheism by the 54th page,
do you not think it is time to rest the fingers?

Cheers, Suze.

mr suss has not attempted to affirm his claimed evidence

court officer notes mr suss
has refuied to re-affirm that he claims as ..his evidence

thus it has been done for him...as is

and as the heresay ....it rightfully allways was

http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=120&t=3225&p=19861#p19861

as it doesnt meet the standard of testimony

it is thus excluded from the public/record

so saying i note
he has two days remaining
to present it...the onlt evidence noted by this revieuwer..was re the evolution statement from the charletains

67 members of the Inter Academy Panel (IAP),..representing the world’s national science academies.

The Executive Board of ICSU
(International Council for Science) has also endorsed the statement.

http://www.interacademies.net/?id=6176

please be advised their statement isnt stating any science
this so called proof isnt proof but heresay...

in lue of the cowardlty..mr suss presenting his proof...
proof validating mr suss's claims...must stand as quoted...but not in evidence...thus heresay

have a nice day

OUG, your nuts, and a total hypocrite.

your 'court' that you are 'running' has no jurisdiction over me just by claiming you do. You are just like the state which you profess to disregard in your 'freemen society'. Total hypocrisy. You are doing the same thing. Your freemen society shows itself for what it is. Another state that imposes it's will on others. What you claim of atheists is what you are doing quite openly right now. Hypocrite.

I see what your freemen society is now, you are claiming power over others through coercion. You label others fighting for their rights, with exactly what you are doing in an attempt to hide from the fact you are just another state.

The World Freemen Society claim de jure courts, but impose them the same way as the State does. They are kangaroo court process. Total hypocrisy.

I have provided evidence, you have provided nothing in lieu of that.

Can I start a court too? :) or is this just your right, your court, your judgement on what is affirmed evidence or not, whilst you don't have to provde any evidence at all? Why am I being 'charged' when you do not have to suffer the same law? hypocrite.

Your freemen society shows itself to be another state claiming power over others. hypocrites.