The Forum > General Discussion > Is God back?
Is God back?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Clause 29: No Freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any otherwise destroyed; nor will we pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful Judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.
The word We twice in Clause 29, denotes the Royal Plural, Almighty God and Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, and the word Royal denotes the nexus between Almighty God and the Sovereign upon which all land titles are based. The Law of the Land referred to in Clause 29 was and remains Christianity, and is incorporated into the Australian Constitution by the inclusion of The Queen or Her Majesty, at least forty times in its text.
Freehold land has value, jury trial guaranteed that in all cases where its ownership came into dispute, and jury trial comes out of the New Testament. There were Judges in the Old Testament, but a blanket prohibition on judging in the New Testament. To get around that Biblical prohibition, the English Christians legislated to have twelve disciples of Jesus Christ form a court, with a Justice to preside, and take their verdict. Jury trial is a manifestation of the promise of Jesus Christ, to be where two or three are gathered together in His name: Matthew 18 :20 A Writ called a Christian meeting together in the Queens name.
In Luke 12 verse 10, Jesus Christ warns against blasphemy, which occurs when a Judge sits without a jury. The legislation creating Judges should be deeply offensive to all Bible believing Christians of all denominations