As usual, the poor lasses from PALE are struggling with reality.

PALE:"JW,
I have only read bits of this thread but one things jumps out at me.
Your correct about people using their own names."

If you read this thread, you will see that the dishonest JW and SallyG have gone out of their way to conceal a piece of identifying detail aposted by JW about herself that contradicted her own lies. She wanted OTHER people to reveal their names, while she did her very poor best to conceal her own

No privacy, I do see where you're coming from. Unfortunately, the unaccountable CSA may well be a reason for your ex's behaviour. In my own case I was happy to pay a reasonable amount of CS and did so for some years. Where it all went wrong was when the ex decided to ask for a change of assessment. That was the point at which JW got involved and decided to try to stitch me up with an assessment based on "capacity to earn" as she determined it, resulting in an assessment based on an income some 25% greater than I was actually earning, leaving me unable to meet basic living costs. the real problem was that she completely failed to justify her determination of my earning capacity and the Agency swung in behind her to try to bully me into compliance. As those who know my history here will attest, I don't take kindly to bullies and I especially dislike cowardly bullies who won't take any personal responsibility for their actions. Needless to say, the situation deteriorated, with me refusing to pay anything in the end until they fixed their errors. I might add that all this took place just as my ex decided that she needed more custody of the children, presumably to increase her claim on Govt support and CS.

My point is that if my ex had simply come to me and negotiated, we'd all be better off. By delegating her own part in the negotiation to the CSA she gave away her right to influence the outcome. The matter became something that was between me and the CSA, not between me and her. My recommendation is to discuss things with your ex, because if you don't and he is in a position to make things difficult for the CSA, you may well end up with a non-result and you'll still have to deal with the CSA.

If it helps, the new CS legislation requires all parties to a CS matter to lodge tax returns annually.

I've now realised what antiseptic did, and how he's manipulated the people here.

He's a bit smarter than I gave him credit for initially. Initially, when I looked up his quote by JW, I assumed antiseptic made it all up, because when I checked there was no such post by JW. Therefore, I assumed antiseptic falsified the entire quote and that he didn't expect anyone to check up on him.

Let's go to the beginning. What was antiseptic's reason for the presence of the quote in his post? It was to show that JW was a woman, after JW said in a post here that he was a man. that's it. That's the ONLY reason for antiseptic's insertion of a JW quote, a quote that JW did not fully write himself by the way. As everyone here knows, you can get posts deleted after they've been posted. Many posts are deleted, for many reasons.

What antiseptic has done is this. While checking JW's history, he's inadvertently come across a situation where it's obvious JW has had a post deleted. He knows this because of the replies to JW's post by forum members. They even quoted things that JW said in the deleted post. Now, what better way to defame another forum member is there than to invent just a few words, the beginning of the quote where JW implies he has a "husband", and then finish the quote with some of the real JW phrases quoted by other forum members. These would be the "real" quotes written by the "real" JW.

This is a great plan invented by antiseptic. It would be almost impossible for JW to argue against. Antiseptic has shown he HATES and REVILES a particular woman at the CSA. Because JW has the same initials as this woman he's been CONTINUALLY casting doubt on the honesty of that poster and claims the poster is really his hated woman at the CSA. It's yet ANOTHER conspiracy theory from antiseptic.

But just having a conspiracy theory is not enough for antiseptic.

He goes further and falsifies missing posts.

CONTINUED..

I've now realised what antiseptic did, and how he's manipulated the people here.

He's a bit smarter than I gave him credit for initially. Initially, when I looked up his quote by JW, I assumed antiseptic made it all up, because when I checked there was no such post by JW. Therefore, I assumed antiseptic falsified the entire quote and that he didn't expect anyone to check up on him.

Let's go to the beginning. What was antiseptic's reason for the presence of the quote in his post? It was to show that JW was a woman, after JW said in a post here that he was a man. That's it. That's the ONLY reason for antiseptic's insertion of a JW quote, a quote that JW did not fully write himself by the way. As everyone here knows, you can get posts deleted after they've been posted. Many posts are deleted, for many reasons.

What antiseptic has done is this. While checking JW's history, he's inadvertently come across a situation where it's obvious JW has had a post deleted. He knows this because of the replies to JW's post by forum members. They even quoted things that JW said in the deleted post. Now, what better way to defame another forum member is there than to invent just a few words, the beginning of the quote where JW implies he has a "husband", and then finish the quote with some of the real JW phrases quoted by other forum members. These would be the "real" quotes written by the "real" JW.

This is a great plan invented by antiseptic. It would be almost impossible for JW to argue against. Antiseptic has shown he HATES and REVILES a particular woman at the CSA. Because JW has the same initials as this woman he's been CONTINUALLY casting doubt on the honesty of that poster and claims the poster is really his hated woman at the CSA. It's yet ANOTHER conspiracy theory from antiseptic.

But just having a conspiracy theory is not enough for antiseptic.

He goes further and falsifies missing posts.

CONTINUED..

**Sorry for the double posts above.**

It took a day or two to figure out what antiseptic's really done, as it was a sneaky and involved plan. I guess we can now see why authorities would throw up their hands when dealing with antiseptic.

I've also seen that antiseptic wrote that his partner should have just come straight to him to negotiate child support, and then all their troubles would be over. NO THEY WOULDN'T. He seems such a controlling and manipulative man, and dealing directly with his partner would put him in the box seat to exert even more **CONTROL**.

I reckon that's why she went to the CSA instead of him. Can anyone really blame her?

SallyG, I've had enough of your dishonesty. GrahamY himself said that the post existed and he deleted it. Are you suggesting Graham is lying to back me up?

SallyG:"What was antiseptic's reason for the presence of the quote in his post? It was to show that JW was a woman, after JW said in a post here that he was a man. that's it. That's the ONLY reason for antiseptic's insertion of a JW quote"

Yep, that about sums it up. JW claimed to be a man and I showed where she claimed to be a woman. That would make her a liar. See, it's not that hard, is it?

SallyG:"a quote that JW did not fully write himself by the way."

Oh, I see, the post didn't exist, but if it did, she didn't write it. LOL, my kids learnt not to try that on some years back and they're not teenagers yet. Perhaps you might tell us who you imagine DID write it?

SallyG:"He seems such a controlling and manipulative man"

I imagine showing you and your little friend to be entirely dishonest would make you say that. Tell us again about credibility, hon.

SallyG:"he's inadvertently come across a situation where it's obvious JW has had a post deleted"

No, I copied from the post, then it was deleted. JW was embarrassed to have been caught out so easily and tried to cover her tracks by having it deleted. See, it's still easy to follow.

Would you like me to ask GrahamY to confirm the sequence of events? I'm sure he can even tell us what time JW's email asking him to remove it was sent.

Just go away Sally, you're a liar and not even a good one.

Stop embarrassing yourself.