Didn't you even bother to read my post?

Well, of course not.

Your first paragraph shows how accusatory and manipulative you are. Because, in my post I actually said the POST EXISTED, and I actually said the post WAS DELETED. Therefore, I couldn't possibly be saying Graham is lying about the post's existence and deletion.

You are sooooooooooooooooooo manipulative.

I've reached my post limit, and unfortunately that gives you the opportunity to continue unabated for another 24 hours with your personal attacks against, and criminal accusations against, CSA employees.

This is the post that JW had deleted, in its entirety:

"My husband and I have always done our own thing when it comes to eating. He's quite um...large, while I'm pretty skinny. I keep telling him he'll die young while I'll live to a happy and healthy old age, but he doesn't want to listen. What is it about men and the way so many of them neglect their health? Maybe it's a chromosome abnormality."

Posted by JW, Friday, 29 August 2008 2:18:41 AM

I have made no additions or deletions to the post as it was posted to OLO.

Oh dear me, he's still trying to get in the last word.

Here's a quote written by antiseptic,

"I despise all women who disagree with my opinions. If a woman agrees with me then she's a fine example of womanhood"

Posted by antiseptic, Saturday, 30 August 2008 9:24:46 AM

Just because I typed in a quote, does this mean antiseptic REALLY posted that? NO

Let's say he did post it, hypothetically, but he really wrote that he loved all women no matter what. Could I re-write the quote as I have above, putting my own words/interpretation in? Yes I could. In fact I did.

Anyone can type in a so-called quote. Doubt has been cast upon the accuracy of antiseptic's JW quote.

As I've shown ANYONE can type ANY quote and say that someone else is responsible for that quote, and that the quote is word perfect. It can't be "proven" otherwise, when the quote no longer exists.

I tend to believe SallyG's version of events. She says the quote existed, was deleted, that antiseptic typed with his own hand a very similar quote and altered it marginally. Is that you're suggesting SallyG? It seems to be.

Hang on Sally G, as it says in one of my posts I re read every one of JWs posts.
Startled by what I saw as pure venom from her I tried to work her out.
Those words did appear in her post.
However I truly am unsure is it her or him?
I note you told us one of us was a sock puppet, that is using two different sign ins.
No insult intended but that private message JW posted in this thread and some other actions make me question are there more than one of her/him?

Thanks Belly,you made me smile too.Whats going on ,and why is everyone so angry.I think your all great.Just when I think I know whats going on,someone throws a spanner in the ring and I get all confused again lol.

phillips:"Doubt has been cast upon the accuracy of antiseptic's JW quote."

No, it hasn't. Doubt has been cast on the sanity of SallyG, however. In fact, I'll correct myself; there is no doubt that SallyG's sanity is marginal. There is equally no doubt that JW is a liar, just as there is no doubt that you yourself are a few neurons short of a full cerebral complement.

phillips:"It can't be "proven" otherwise, when the quote no longer exists"

I refer you to the moderator's coments. He is the one who removed it and his comment was: "Forrest Gump, I removed the quote. It did exist."

Thanks for the opportunity to set the record straight.

Just so there's no confusion and in case it slipped past those lonely neurons floating in the void that passes for your mind, JW asked for the post to be removed after I quoted from it because it clearly showed her to be a liar. Her efforts and those of both SallyG and yourself since have only confirmed that she is also stupid. Well done.