Antiseptic, I'd rather stay out of guesses about peoples real names and genders etc. I've found the quote you mentioned where JW claimed to have a husband, I saw a more recent one refering to JW's wife. I don't like the aspersions JW posted about those of us who want some privacy from ex's knowing our details but I know little else about JW.

I tried to find the post you refered to from the "Posted by JW, Friday, 29 August 2008 2:18:41 AM" but could not find it. Can you post a link to it please. Any chance that you've mistaken JW for someone else?

From JW's posting history -
.....
» 1/09/2008 4:13:13 PM I can see why Antiseptic has problems fitting in. When you read his posts on other topics,.....
» 29/08/2008 2:08:20 AM Hear, hear SallyG and AJPhilips. You have both shown there's more than one side to the to.....
» 17/08/2008 2:50:14 PM I read that earlier post by Pericles, and I too thought it sounded like a made up story. .....
» 30/07/2008 2:19:39 PM Yes they do Steven. ALL war criminals deserve prosecution......

R0bert

Hi Robert, a while ago you wrote that maybe the only person I was talking about in my first contribution here was divorce doctor. Well, you pretty much got that correct. My comments were NOT directed towards you. I basically have no real arguments with your opinions, we don't agree 100% on a few things, but most people don't agree 100% anyway. I should have read more closely what you've been saying here, but every time I come to this site I'm pushed for time and always rushing. Again, my apologies, my initial comments were NOT meant for you.

Sal, I've dealt with antiseptic, and he continues to avoid backing up his outrageous charges of CSA illegality, but is happy to engage in his silly little game playing. Thanks for the backup Sal, but I wouldn't bother about it, I can easily defend myself. By paying him attention you're just giving him more fodder for his cannon. Maybe we should all just ignore him. He just comes up with excuse after excuse for what he does. It's never ending, he just posts again and again and again and again and again. He's probably one of those poor souls who MUST get the last word!

Like I said, he's been dealt with, and it's there for all to see. Don't worry about him. His biggest problem is himself.

Not related to topic: Here's a message for Stony (you know who you are). Thanks for the 2 emails and the music, but your address is now bouncing. Try again and include your mobile no. as well. I'm off again in 3 days time, and it's a 8 month trip this time, for once we'll include Ghana. Hoping you'll see this in the next day, as I've lost all contact details and I'll need the phone number because I'll not be accessing the internet at all while away. Good luck with the audition.

SallyG:"such a quote doesn't exist, anywhere in any of the posts by JW"

Now that IS interesting, becasue the post most certainly did exist and it was by JW. In fact, it appears to have been removed, no doubt at JW's request. It was in the thread "My Partner made me fat" and there are the following replies referring to a post by JW that seems to have disappeared:

1. From GrahamY:"Come on JW, I doubt that it has anything to do with the lack or otherwise of a y chromosome. I'm sure I've got a Y chromosome and I've never been shy of looking after my health.

I think the reasons that men are less likely to police their health than women have to do with the work pressures that are put on them, combined with the risk-taking bravado that characterises many male social groupings - the sort of thing that turns drinking from a social occupation into a competitive sport. So you don't want to appear a sissy by being too picky about the risky behaviour you undertake, it might lower your score.

Another reason is that doctors are always running late, and tend to be most available during work hours. A combination of factors that means men are less likely to go to see one. I combat at least one of them by ringing up 30 minutes before my appointment to see how late the doctor is running. Makes the visit a little more manageable.
Posted by GrahamY, Friday, 29 August 2008 10:54:59 AM"

cont

2. This from Bronwyn:
"JW

"What is it about men and the way so many of them neglect their health?"

[deleted for brevity]

Posted by Bronwyn, Friday, 29 August 2008 11:08:56 AM"

Perhaps the moderators might like to respond to the question of why that post of JW's was deleted?

JW:"I'll not be accessing the internet at all"

And you've no doubt got lots of other lies you'd like to tell us about yourself as well, all in the name of having nothing "that is private or secret", of course.

I wonder what a search of the forum's IP address logs might show up about where JW works? Anybody like to place a little wager?

JW thanks for the clarification. I'm still wondering about the plural aspect of your comment but if that the result of a typo during a rushed post then fine.

I've not worked out how much of your conflict with antiseptic flows from elsewhere, I have the impression that it may be be a considerable portion. I've posted some comments on the DV thread to Fractelle which put my position regarding Antiseptic and Usual Suspect. If you have an interest in the issues around privacy and CSA may I suggest that you leave off the attacks on antiseptic and talk about how you think it should work. I'd like to see what changes if antiseptic (and Usual Suspect if he's still around) were not under regular personal attack but rather debated on what was actually said in their posts.

Do you think that there are real benefits in providing details which some do consider private to people who may already be in conflict? Is the risk for increased harm worth the potential benefit.

Are there ways of providing privacy and still allowing for some kind of check of the credibility of claims made. A third party interviewing both parties perhaps?

R0bert