no privacy, what type of reassessment is involved? Have you confirmed that it is specifically required for the reassessment?

CSA are not real keen to tell you up front that they don't need that info so you may have to ask.

R0bert

I fail to see how the price of our home,the value of our car and where the money in the bank came from is anyone`s business but our own,and lets not forget Big Brother.

you are correct

the CSA has no right to that info UNLESS you GIVE it to them

they get this out of you by rorting Part 6A [Change of assess as they call it]

a SMART bloke would never take part in that farce, so would be sitting in box seat to zap CSA under privacy act

The CSA-Registrar and the Commonwealth-of-Australia are being sued in the pretend Federal Court of Australia in Sydney over these very issues and this matter has been in there since Feb 2008 File No NSD 204, 2008, Whittaker and Rotary Kiln Services -v- The Registrar of CSA and the Cth.
The isssue is the unlawful use and access to the tax Commissioner's data-base of Tax File Number information without the consent of the recipient of the TFN and also calling in to question the constitutional vaility of the 1988 Act and the validity of a Deoarture prohibition Order signed and issued by a staff member not authorised under the Act to issue the PDO.
Counsel for the Applicant, Peter King, is the member of the Liberal party who was deposed by Malchom Turnbul in his seat in Sydney.
The decision in the Luton -v- Lestels is also being called into question as it was not a decision of the High Court of Australia as the matter went before the seven Justices of the Peace and a decision was made in this private hearing in a Tribunal, not the High Court of Australia.
The High Court of Australia, The Federal Court of Australia and the Fed Magistrates Court can not commence the exercise of their Jurisdiction until after the Governor-General issues the PROCLAMATION that authorises the commencement of the exercise of their power, no PROCLAMATION = no jurisdiction, section 2 of the Acts.
There had to be a reason why the Registrar s of the Courts will never sign and Seal with the seal of the particular Court any process issued out of the Court, not even the court orders from the decision in luton -v- Lestles.
Many attempts have been made to be provided with a photo-copy of the origonal, signed and sealed PROCLAMATIONS but they refuse to provide. The only document made available is a typed copy of what the document should look like, but no signature of the Gov-Gen or the GREAT Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia, just the LS stamp.

What's with this paranoid, privacy rubbish?

What are you guys trying to hide?

This has got nothing to do with "legitimate" privacy, but EVERYTHING to do with hiding one's assets and details, in order to avoid giving one cent to one's children and/or ex partners.

And you people know it!

Some pathetic people think their money and assets are totally theirs' and theirs' alone and F*#@ their responsibilities to their broken families.

It's because of irresponsible people like them that these laws exist in the first place.

You guys don't like it? Too bloody bad!

You took the 'sex' willingly.

Now how about now growing up and taking the resulting 'responsibility' willingly: Act like men.

JW perhaps you should have a look at your own sexist assumptions.

I'm the full time carer of my son so privacy does not save anything except my preference for my ex to not know my financial details.

My income comes from PAYEE employment so I don't have opportunity to hide income from the taxman even if that was a choice I was willing to live with.

I just don't want my details passed on to me ex nor do I think I should have access to hers.

R0bert