He continues to refuse to answer me. These are the challenges I asked of him; name the CSA employees who have engaged in illegal activity and include the proof and his real name at the end. That's it, not hard to answer.

He continues to refuse to answer.

Antiseptic now has no credibility, as almost everyone here now knows. He's even been reduced to doing what Sally did, trying to make out people against him are posting under a different name. At least Sally admitted she only suspected antiseptic of posting under another name. But antiseptic is not like that, he just address someone by another's name, thinking that mud will stick and help him look more credible.

As I've said here before, this is all just a game to antiseptic. He has no "real" interest in equality for all men, all women and fairness for all all children, unlike almost everyone else here. As soon as anyone defends a woman, he's the first to imply that you don't care about men and therefore you must be a woman, or even worse..a reviled feminist. He's a defensive and mildly disturbed man judging from his posts here.

Note his false implication that I'm a "woman ", a "CSA" employee and he's even falsely identified me because my on line name is "JW". It seems he knows of someone at CSA who has the initials JW, and he's been falsely implying, time and time again on this thread, that I am that person.

He's a conspiracy theory specialist, and a rather paranoid one at that. On other topics, I've noticed when the argument doesn't go his way he sometimes implies that some people invent a little friend. He thinks his little conspiracy theories help him look authoritative and in control.

The basis of his refusal to answer my straightforward challenge is he can't stand to get beaten, and getting beaten by someone he "thinks" is a woman is anathema to him.

Continued...

I'll continue to repeat my challenge to him whenever he replies, for as long as it takes. I'll continue to expose his anti woman philosophy and his unwillingness to consider children "first" in CSA and other life matters.

He's so caught with his own anti female paranoia and anti child "first" philosophy and conspiracy theories in various areas of life, that he's lost touch with reality. He's unraveling before our very eyes. It's quite sad really.

JW:"Note his false implication that I'm a "woman ""

JW:"My husband and I have always done our own thing when it comes to eating. He's quite um...large, while I'm pretty skinny. I keep telling him he'll die young while I'll live to a happy and healthy old age, but he doesn't want to listen. What is it about men and the way so many of them neglect their health? Maybe it's a chromosome abnormality."

Posted by JW, Friday, 29 August 2008 2:18:41 AM

So, what is it JW? Are you lying about having a husband or are you lying about not being a woman? So much for "credibility", eh? I note that the disparagement of men is consistent, however. At least you have your values, eh?

It must be difficult for you to adjust to telling the truth after so long telling lies as part of your job with the CSA.

You've still not answered the simple question about who you are, or what you claim as your authority in your numerous efforts to order me to do your bidding. You needn't bother now, you've already demonstrated that whatever you say is likely to be a lie. They do say that character will out...

samsung, all I'm trying to do is see if JW abides by the standards he or she demands of others. In this case with a question which has far less serious consequences to answer and which could potentially reflect on me.

As one of those who had already posted in support of concerns about the lack of privacy in CSA's processes JW's comment would appear to claim that I was trying to hide details of my assets in order to cheat the system. Nothing unusual about someone making blatently false allegations against other posters and later doing a wiggle to suggest that the comment only applied to those who were doing so but given JW's moralising about the need to answer questions and to back up allegations it seems appropriate for JW to do the same.

I'm no big fan of Divorce Doctor, and have not been overly tempted to visit his website. His postings on this site are enough to tell me all I need to know. If DD was the sole target of JW's original post on this thread then that should be an easy question to answer (with perhaps a side note to say that the plural was a mistake).

Simply it seems that JW is happy to make a broad and nasty accusation against those with different views to his or herself and demand a level of accountability of others far beyond what JW has shown for his or her self so far.

It's possible I've utterly misunderstood JW's behaviour but I doubt it.

I don't like my ex being supplied with my financial details by a third party nor do I think I should be supplied with hers.

That does not imply an attempt to cheat the system rather it reflects on the fact that she is someone who I have had significant conflict with and who I don't trust to use information fairly.

R0bert

R0bert:"Simply it seems that JW is happy to make a broad and nasty accusation against those with different views to his or herself and demand a level of accountability of others far beyond what JW has shown for his or her self so far."

JW claims that "I have nothing to hide, regarding ANY aspect of my life" but obviously feels that she does have to try to hide the fact she is female. She also seems to feel that she needs to hide her name and her employment by the CSA. Whilst the last bit is entirely understandable (after all, who'd want to admit to it) it shows that she is as dishonest outside her job as she is when she is at work.

I guess that when one is used to working for the CSA and having authority with no responsibility, one becomes habituated to dishonesty. Yet another reason not to trust the Agency with any information at all.

I can't believe what I'm reading. The personal attacks from antiseptic are staggering. Why is he doing this?

He's also made up a quote from another member, and claims that the quote was written by that member. Read his first post on this page. Well guess what? I went back and checked , and such a quote doesn't exist, anywhere in any of the posts by JW. I checked every single post written by JW since he's been on this OLO website. I guess antiseptic wasn't expecting anybody to take the time check up on him.

Yes, he made it up.

And he's now claiming to have revealed the real identity of JW. He's revealed what he says is JW's real name in a past post, says JW is a woman, says says JW works for CSA and is hiding it. Antiseptic has shown he's a nasty piece of work with his lies. He writes phony quotes (and got caught out) and now makes phony employment accusations. JW has said in the past he's a male.

Someone has written that antiseptic is a conspiracy theorist when he gets in defensive mode. I think that's just been proven to be true.

Get help for your yourself antiseptic, there's people in the professional community who can help you.