The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Privacy and THE CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY

Privacy and THE CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 24
  15. 25
  16. 26
  17. All
Now, here he goes again, if someone shows that he manipulated a quote he then throws juvenile accusations of insanity. That's a typical controlling behaviour exerted by abusive people, especially within the sphere of domestic violence.

We should note that antiseptic lied (yet again) in his above post. By quoting the moderator as saying "I removed the quote. It did exist", antiseptic is attempting to IMPLY that when he manually typed his reproduction of the quote, he did not alter it. My claim, as antiseptic very well knows, is NOT that the quote didn't exist. My claim is that antiseptic altered it slightly, in order to say what the original quote did NOT say. The moderator did **NOT** say that antiseptic typed a word perfect reproduction of the quote. All he said was "I removed the quote. It did exist". EVERYBODY knows that.

Antiseptic KNOWS that nobody can PROVE he altered that quote slightly. So he feels on safe ground.
Posted by SallyG, Saturday, 11 October 2008 11:49:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I refer yet again to GrahamY:"Forrest Gump, I removed the quote. It did exist."

SallyG:"Antiseptic KNOWS that nobody can PROVE he altered that quote slightly"

Nobody sane would make the accusation. Feel free to take the matter up with the site moderators. Expect much derision.
Posted by Antiseptic, Sunday, 12 October 2008 6:29:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Antiseptic + other posters

Thats the whole point really isnt it.
If we all used our real names there would not be a problem.

All I can say Anti everything is if I had to put my money on whos telling the truth- due to experience with you on OLO my money goes to the other ponies!

I still cant understand WHY you accused on a public forum our organisation of offering you a BRIBE-

This was based on the fact we said quote
Anti IF you are really interested to help animals we would be happy to assist with a small amount of funding. ie Computers. net connection paper etc.

From THAT you said we offered you a 'bribe!?

So you dont get our vote as a honest person- or a very nice one either.

Shame on You
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Sunday, 12 October 2008 7:30:47 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PALE & IF:"if I had to put my money on whos telling the truth- due to experience with you on OLO my money goes to the other ponies!"

I merely reiterate yet again what the site moderator stated:":"Forrest Gump, I removed the quote. It did exist."

Take it up with GrahamY or your psychiatrist. I know which one will give you more time and it's not necessarily the one you'd get the most benefit from listening to.

PALE & IF:" still cant understand WHY you accused on a public forum our organisation of offering you a BRIBE"

Because you did. Glad to have sorted that out. If you've any further questions, I charge by the hour, just like your psychiatrist.
Posted by Antiseptic, Sunday, 12 October 2008 7:37:55 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It seems unlikely that Graham would state that he had removed a post which has been quoted elsewhere if that quote was a misrepresentation of the content of the post. I assume that the site would maintain a copy of deleted posts for auditing purposes and for legal protection and if thats the case Graham would have access to the original.

It's possible that Graham has just checked the date of the post and noted that one was removed but given the contention over the content it seems unlikely.

I'd rather the thread move on from a focus on JW and Antiseptic and look for better alternatives to disclosure of personal details to ex's.

No Privacy, welcome back. Thanks for the info on your situation.

R0bert
Posted by R0bert, Sunday, 12 October 2008 8:27:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Robert, I bet Graham doesn't remember the EXACT wording of the deleted post. There's probably nothing more he can do than state an original post existed and that the post was deleted. Like I said, everyone knows that now. I suspect antiseptic has been contacting Graham and complaining for all he's worth, and trying with his usual manipulative ways to engage Graham's support. I'm sure Graham throws up his hands every time antiseptic complains about people who don't share "his" opinions and complains about those who engage in the same behaviours here that "he" engages in. I believe in free speech, and won't contact a moderator or forum owner no matter how much manipulation someone like antiseptic uses.

Antiseptic has been shown to be a liar, and that's where it rests. I'm glad to have cleared that up.
Posted by SallyG, Sunday, 12 October 2008 12:36:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 24
  15. 25
  16. 26
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy