Hi Trumpster,

A little research does show that there an estimated 53,000 women and girls living in Australia who have undergone FGM/C, but what you are not saying is the vast majority have been done overseas and not in Australia where the practice is illegal and isolated. There is no evidence that it is a widespread practice in Australia.

I would call that assertion a beat up, as all its intended to do is manipulate public opinion against a section of the migrant population.

Asking again, what widespread changes do YOU want invoked to turn Australia from a multicultural society to a monocultural one. I assume the focus of One Nation would be to ban people not of some Anglo-Celtic heritage and replace them with Anglophiles. That might be easier said than done.

If Australia was to stop all immigration, that would be a calamity in the long run. If Australia completely stopped immigration, the country would face a rapidly ageing population, severe labour shortages, and a significant federal budget deficit. The country would be overrun with Old Farts. The only products available in the supermarkets would be tins of 'Horlicks', boxes of 'Doz-Ezy' tabs, and packets of incontinence pads. No one working, with everyone living in the Shady Pines Retirement Home, spending their days playing Parcheesi in the mornings, and taking nanny naps in the afternoons. Is that how you see the future of Australia? A land of incontinent people playing Parcheesi!

Twisted spin is all you have tosser. You use lies and distortion to suit your bigotry and prove your prejudices. But any objective enquirer can see the truth.

A waste of time arguing with your sort you cant be rational. All you have is hate.
Pretty sad really.

"'But male genital mutilation is considered healthy and beneficial.'"

Well that certainly was its original purpose. Whereas FGM was introduced to stop women enjoying coitus.

_____________________________________________________________________

"A waste of time arguing with your sort"

mikk makes an absurd claim. I dispute it. Two options. (1) prove the claim or (2) head for the hills. Who's surprised that mikk chose door two?

________________________________________________________________________

"Asking again, what widespread changes do YOU want invoked to turn Australia from a multicultural society to a monocultural one."

This is getting quite hilarious Paul. You either can't or won't get it. I don't want to turn Australia from a multicultural society. I've already said more times than necessary that we are multicultural, always have been, always will be. Just like almost every other nation on the planet. But what I support is turning away from multicultural-ISM ie reverse the governmental policy that claims, without evidence, that all those cultures are equally valid and should be equally supported which becomes a policy of promoting all cultures other than the one that made Australia, Australia.

"A little research..." research that I showed you....you're welcome.
"an estimated 53,000 women and girls living in Australia who have undergone FGM/C"... which is acknowledged to be most likely an underestimate. Others say 120,000.

"but what you are not saying is the vast majority have been done overseas ".... well even if that's true, and you have no evidence for it, it doesn't obviate the fact that we have cultural groups here that support that practice.

________________________________________________________________

How other countries view multiculturalism.... http://opentranscripts.org/transcript/forbidden-research-rites-vs-rights/

Well lookie here, JD's back.

"You describe multiculturalism as though it were engaged in a deliberate project to undermine Anglo-European culture."

That's your misunderstanding. Not deliberate but just a natural consequence of a failed policy doctrine. Not all cultures are equal nor equally valid. But to elevate those that are clearly inferior to equal status, others have to be dragged down. It wasn't the original aim of the policy but became its natural consequence.

("or "appears to", if "seems" is still triggering for you". Why would 'seem' be triggering?)

"So where is this subversion you're talking about?"

Let me count the ways (and this is a small subset of the ways...)

Massacre at Bondi caused by an alien culture that was/is allowed to fester because of a fear of being called racist if its called out. Add to that the fact that the agencies that could/should have stopped it long before it happened were more concerned about people looking to defend Australian culture than those looking to change it.

Regular mass marches celebrating the murder and mass rape of 1000's of Jews. Old Australian values don't celebrate the wanton murder of kids because they are the wrong race.

On this very thread we see people trying very hard to excuse or minimise a truly abhorrent practice simply because its done by cultures they think they need to uplift.

The appalling condition of 1/3rd of the aboriginal race vis a vis their fellow Australians is largely caused by our reluctance to point out that their destitution is the direct result of their culture, because, again, we have to pretend that their culture is equal in value to the Anglo-European culture.

And so forth....

"(1) prove the claim"

I already did then you came back with more lies and distortions of the data.

And your last two posts are nothing more than advocacy for white supremacy. And racist. KKK much?

mhaze,

You've responded to a question about cultural subversion with a list of social problems. But my question wasn't whether Australia has problems. Every society has problems. My question was where the evidence is that Anglo-European culture is being displaced or subverted.

Let's take your examples one by one...

Bondi:
Even if I accepted your characterisation of it as the product of an "alien culture", one violent individual is not evidence that Australian culture is being replaced.

Gaza protests:
Protest movements have existed throughout Australian history. Many participants are Australian-born. How does a protest, however objectionable you find it, demonstrate the displacement of Australian culture?

FGM:
FGM is illegal. It is prosecuted. It is overwhelmingly condemned by Australian society. That seems to demonstrate the dominance of Australian norms rather than their defeat.

Aboriginal disadvantage:
Even if I accepted your explanation for it, how does Indigenous disadvantage demonstrate the subversion of Anglo-European culture?

All four examples appear to be examples of problems you dislike. None appear to be examples of Anglo-European culture losing its dominant position in Australian society.

So we're back to my original question:

Where is the evidence that Anglo-European culture is being displaced rather than simply confronting the same sorts of social problems that every society confronts?