Washington Posts's credibility and reporting work over
the last century?

The publication is one of the leading daily newspapers
in the United States and its circulation figures are good
considering the direction of print media in recent years.

The Washington Post has moved with the times and made the
necessary shift towards digital along with many print
outlets, with positive results.

The newspaper has a large number of digital subscribers
world wide and is amongst the most popular news brands in
the US.

The Washington Post frequently ranks in the top five brands
in terms of monthly users, along with the likes of
The New York Times, CNN and FOX News.

The Washington Post is perhaps best known for its coverage
of the Watergate Scandal in the 1970s led by
Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward.

"Democracy ain't perfect but I'd prefer to have the choice between two fools"
- You'd prefer to be lead by fools, so long as you 'feel' like you have a choice of which particular fool?
Interesting.

That there might be a part of the problem, and why the West is losing.
- And why our countries are going down the toilet.

As for Putin...
He's been in a permanent position as President or Prime Minister since 1999, 24 years.
In comparison to Albo, such a great product of 'democracy'
- Well, your mate Albo, the champion of democracy, is a schoolboy compared to Putin, a statesman.
Albo will be out of the job and into some barely known think-tank writing crap editorials no-one will read or care about before his balls have even dropped, compared to Putin with 24 years experience at the leadership helm.

All the Western leaders will be gone.
But Putin will still be there.

Here's something from a conservative news outlet:

http://thedispatch.com/article/stop-calling-trumps-new-york-caper-a-no-harm-crime/

And here's more:

http://independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/stewart-trump-fraud-trial-victimless-b2518916.html

There's more on the web.

AC: "All the Western leaders will be gone.
But Putin will still be there."

Yes...he's a dictator. That was rather my point. Of course we all know you are a shrill for the world's dictators.

___________________________________

Foxy: "and its circulation figures are good"

Well you'd know a lot more than the owners of the paper, obviously. You'd better fill them in, because they think things aren't going so great given that readership has halved in three years.

But as I say, you'd know better than them. Struth!!

Its reported that the Post lost $77 million last year. But I'm sure you can tell us how this is a good result. Its probably only a matter of time before they charge Trump with the theft of that money.

mhaze,

Thank you for your concern.

"It's a given that Washington and the nation need the
Post to survive. No matter how you feel about the
paper, it provides essential coverage of politics,
power, and governance for national readers and still
does its best to do the same on the local scene."

"As a news competitor, it keeps outlets like the
New York Times and the Wall Street Journal sharp and
feeds firestarter to the local news ecosystem of TV
and radio."

Here are 14 strategies from News Industry Experts for
new publisher Will Lewis:

http://politico.com/news/magazine.2024/02/11/advice-for-washington-post-00140793

OOOps. Here's the link again:

http://politico.com/news/magazine/2024/02/11/advice-for-washington-post-00140793