Ah Belly, what you say is so true... the fact is though, we have been reading the same jibberish for the past 12 months. It isn't going to change I am pretty sure of that.

All the girls 'at the office' are of the same mindset. If you disagree with their point of view they see it as a personal attack.

Your attempts to reach them are wasted words. They seem to actually enjoy this kind of persecution.

PF
I stayed off the forum until I saw you here.
I forgave you for what you put up on the forum about me all that time ago because I thought you at least treated your animals better than most.
I was addmitted to hospital after those discusting comments and nearly lost my baby. That would bother you I am sure.
I thought at first it was another poster until I looked back after I got out of hospital.
I was as you know at one time working as often as I could at pale.
I know you wrote to pale complaing about the others. I saw the letter and the copy of their letter you sent.
I know once pale took up your cause you turned on them. I also know that you have caused a lot of trouble in the past. In my opinion your a women who makes nasty comments for no reason.
Pale has responded to a call for posters to use their own names.
Now you will remember when pale was banned for doing just that because you all caused trouble,.
Now I see you have posted Wendy was banned from pale.
Yor a real slice of works Lee.
pale does not answer to anyone other than OLO
Mind you own business as to who is posting
Oh but I forgot- Thats something that you cant do isnt it.

I am one of the people who lost psting rights on OLO a lng time ago.
At that time Robert opended a thread especially to talk about pale and who was posting.
Here we are again and your back to your same tricks.
That is why I stppoed posting on OLO because I thnk there should be one boss and thats Graham Young.
Why should pale put up there name in each post.
Look at you belly, PF and Robert wanted to leave when others suggested everybody use their own name all that time ago.
This thread was opended to give pale the oportunity to repond to complaints about who is posting. I read Graham Youngs comments but I see nne of you have bothered to accept his rules and keep going
you put up yur real real PF and You Robert?
No you dont want to but pale has put their web page up and on it are the names of sme of the people.
Sure pale have members- Hundreds in fact. Do they post on OLO
No but they wanted to
You lot stopped them and I know because I was one of them!
Belly stop playing the victim I have been reading all your posts from the start.
I am surprised pale didnt respond earlier.

Thanks for giving credibility to my comments and backing me up TarynW

Yes, but PALE, you haven't answered why you can't post under a name other than the organisation, or alternatively, highlighted the benefits of posting under this name.

We're all clear of the pitfalls, but you haven't actually answered my question. If it drags the organisation into these kinds of furores, why bother. If there is a good reason, then OK, but I still haven't heard it.

This all strikes me as a matter of trust. It's possible for any one of us to let others use our names but as far as I can tell, most of us don't.

Even with pseudonyms we trust that we can recognise the person putting forward an opinion. After a while you get to know people from their style. You can trust that they are who they say they are.

I'd recognise BD, Belly, TRTL and many others from their style alone, with or without a name attached. If TRTL's style or opinions suddenly turned up under BD's name, or vice versa, I'd feel betrayed. I'd feel I was being lied to. And I certainly wouldn't trust the name anymore.

And if I can't trust the name then I can't trust anything said in that name either.