The Voice, of course, fits Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting different results; only this time, our Constitution would be changed to affect everything to do with our governance. Anyone who says differently is either stupid or deliberately helping to spread Albanese's lies. Australia could be on the verge being ungovernable

ALbanese is not setting a date for the referendum because, while he doesn't, he can still let the whole atrocity lapse.

Assimilation is the only way to solve the remote-living aborigines problem. We had that on the way, until two other vicious left wingers, Gough Whitlam and Nugget Coombes decided that a 'living museum' was a good idea, which led to welfare dependence, lack of education (even the ability to read, speak and write English), domestic violence and child abuse.

It has been all downhill since, despite billions of wasted dollars, and the Voice would be more of the same, plus devastation for democracy, the rule of law and governance, which would be taken over by the High Court.

Also utter bulldust is 'recognition' and 'closing the gap'. If bush aborigines want to be recognised, they should do it by closing the gap themselves, just like their urban kin have done.

It has been proved beyond any shadow of doubt that white money, white virtue-signalling, and the shenanigans of mixed race activists are a waste of time.

Current Elders believe the House is theirs and has been theirs for 65,000 years, now others have come to our home and continue to tell the house elders what they will do for them, when the visitors should honor our house rules in our country. They do not want a Voice set up by the visitors and young and pseudo aboriginals, it must be hosting elders' voices. Vote No to a Governments Voice, as it is not our lore and custom.

It has been pointed out that, many people among the few indicating a Yes vote in the latest Newspoll are those where the language spoken at home is not English. 55% to 34%.

First reaction: are these multicultural minorities looking for something similar for themselves?

But, there is a suggestion that, coming from undemocratic countries as they do, they could be wary of telling the government, a pollster, or any other people they traditionally mistrust, their views on anything political when it is something a government wants them to agree to. If they refuse to answer, they have an inborn belief that they will attract suspicion. So, they say what they think the government will like. Particularly when corporations and other non-political organisations are pushing for Yes. Self-preservation clicks in - and they know that when they do vote, their real vote cannot be attributed to them.

Maybe. We shall see if this dreadful idea goes to a vote because tin-eared Albanese doesn't listen to the voices already available to him.

People can believe whatever they want.
That doesn't change the facts.

Here is a media release on the subject from
the Law Council of Australia supported by
advice from the Solicitor General:

http://lawcouncil.au/media/media-releases/constitutional-amendment-to-provide-for-the-voice-is-just-and-legally-sound-

Sorry for the typo. Here's the link again:

http://lawcouncil.au/media/media-releases/constitutional-amendment-to-provide-for-the-voice-is-just-and-legally-sound

Foxy, you haven't learned a thing. Stop trying to type the URL. Copy and paste as this is accurate and you do not need to keep on posting twice to correct.