The International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1965, and entering into force in 1969. Article 1 defines racial discrimi-nation as:
... any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

There is provision for “special measures” to overcome disadvantage, but these must be temporary, intended to disappear once their objectives have been achieved.

If adopted, the Voice would be for keeps, permanently cemented into the Australian Constitution.

The ABC and SBS are all for Australia becoming an aboriginal Republic, and this can be a way of getting rid of the Westminster system of the Colonizers oppressive Powers. The makarrata commission is more than advisory, it is a war term meaning to cripple. When it is fully installed aboriginals will have self-determination over their tribal lands. The Federal Government must just get the Voice in the Constitution and the States will create the Treaty and repatriations.

http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/chaos-wa-labor-party-in-a-pile-of-pain-as-wa-heritage-laws-are-set-to-be-scrapped/ar-AA1eQvWi?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=cd18b8388dab4eedac3eb4f4de07dd0d&ei=150

A crazy concept I think. What is wrong with the concept of the law applying to people independently of their heritage?

So what could happen? In the case of police identifying indigenous people at risk of harm and abuse, could they act immediately, or would they first have to consult an officer of an indigenously elected Voice? It just seems like another layer of bureaucracy interfering with people at the coal face, as seems to be happening in Western Australia:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12304769/Perth-tree-planting-event-axed-Aboriginal-corp-demands-2-5M-approval.html

And the PM blames the "lies" of the "no" campaigners? Hoist with his own petard more like.

This has been explained heaps of times on this Forum
and some people still persist in scare tactics.
Hopefully they will not work with rational and decent
Australians.

Here's a link that explains:

http://theconversation.com/why-cant-we-just-establish-the-voice-to-parliament-through-legislation-a-constitutional-law-expert-explains-203652#

The Voice must be protected in the Constitution through the
Uluru Statement From the Heart because of the request from
Indigenous Australians.

As the PM pointed out that:

"You can't say you want to listen to Indigenous Australians and
that you support a voice but then not listen to the very first
point in the form of recognition they want."

The PM stressed that the Voice would be governed by legislation.

Hopefully the scare tactics won't work.

I just read earlier on that Albo said if the Voice fails, the indigenous won't get recognised in the constitution. Why the hell not ??
They must be recognised no if's not but's ! It's the other part of the Voice, the power grabbing racial stuff by the hate consumed pretend-indigenous activists that causes all the division !
I was amazed at how many real indigenous are actually against that part of the Voice. Looks like they're awake to the morally bankrupt Woke manipulators !

Writer Michael Connor puts the start of the Voice at a conference in Townsville in 1981, where a group of Leftist activists produced the Mabo Case, and thrust the "stupidity and and confusion, freeholders and hoaxers and Bruce Pascoe into our present".

Among the activists was historian Henry Reynolds, who proposed that the conference recognise that the prerequisite for aboriginality is "cultural loyalty and not a false nineteenth-century genetic theory".

The motion was passed unanimously, and this led to the "white takeover" of aboriginality by 2011.

Race was out; "ethnic nationalism" was in. Reynolds wrote that race could be dispensed with by viewing aborigines as "either actual or potential nations".

No wonder the Left will not have a bar of DNA testing for people putting their hands out for special treatment and money.

Using Australian Research Council funding, the activist historian Reynolds fabricated evidence about our history: the result was a book called 'The Law of the Land'. His destruction of our history was accepted by academics, and used towards achieving their goals. It is also accepted by Minister Burney (who has added her own lie about aborigines being administered in accordance with the Fauna and Flora Act) who brings the rubbish into Parliament. It is also used to make school children hate their country.

And, the whole filthy, rotten plot would be revealed if the Voice got up. Too late then, of course.