Dear individual,

My decision is based on information corroborated
by reliable sources. Yours is based on bias and
bigotry, inaccuracy, and taken from sources that
have twisted the truth for their own gains.

Big difference. Your conscience is skewed.

"my decision which I base on moral & integrity" haaaaaaaaaaaaa! This coming from a bigoted racists who calls others 'Concrete Jungle Bunnies"! Foxy you gotta laugh at some other peoples delusional thinking, its not a joke, Indy actually thinks that he got some kind of moral integrity.

Looking again at Foxy's posts she believes we owe aboriginals rent, it being their land. If you put the rent two 2 cents in the Dollar at the unimproved value of the land per annum, currently blocks in the new housing area I see on TV are listed from $450,000 means we pay $4,500 per annum for living on aboriginal land. This is equal to non-Islamists tax for living in a Muslim country.

"The jizyah is described in the Qurʾān as a tax that is imposed on a certain erring faction from among the People of the Book (Ahl al-Kitāb; non-Muslim groups such as Christians and Jews recognized in the Qurʾān as possessing a divine scripture) who violate their own religious and ethical principles (9:29)"

http://paytherent.net.au/formob/
"All decisions about how Rent is spent and administered are made by a Sovereign Body and the Pay the Rent Sovereign Body is only accountable to mob. We will have regular meetings to report back to the Aboriginal community about initiatives funded and support provided. The first meeting was held in February 2020 at the Victorian Aboriginal Health Service.
Pay the Rent is not accountable to rent payers in relation to how Rent is paid.

Rent money is spent on both community survival needs and the fight for justice.
Any inquiries – please comtact Pay the Rent Executive Officer executiveofficer@paytherent.net.au

THIS PUTS NON-ABORIGINALS AS SECOND CLASS CITIENS IN LAND OUR PARENTS FOUGHT TO PROTECT IN WW2 AGAINST INVASION.

Josephus,

I wish that you would stop telling people what I
believe. And speaking on my behalf. Your views,
assumptions, or interpretations of my opinions
are yours - not mine. Speak for yourself - not me.

Foxy,

The "old" wrongs done long ago before our time are not fixed by creating new wrongs today. There is either racial equality under the law or there is not. The "new" apartheid proposed by the "voice"

Racial equality is a foreign concept to supporters of the "voice/veto"

I cannot understand how making people democratically privileged on a heritage/racial basis is fundamental to improving the lot of indigenous Australians. I think that Albanese is employing Stanley Milgram's psychology in trying to push the "Yes" vote through. The catch for him is that there are authority figures of a differing opinion.

A "no" vote is a violation of the principles of democracy.

"2. Equality

It is not only important but necessary that all people are treated equally in a democracy. This means that they are not discriminated against because of their ethnicity, religion, gender or sexual orientation. It also means that people have equal access to the free enjoyment of their rights – for example, equal access to the voting booth. And when it does come time to vote, it means that every vote counts the same – your vote is just as valuable and counts just as much as the wealthiest or most powerful person in your country. That’s the most fundamental element of equality in a democracy. "

https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/principles-of-democracy/44151