Hi All

What we've all been waiting for:

Here are the Voice Yes and No cases just published on the Australian Electoral Commission site today. These are the:

- "Yes" case in 13 poorly formatted (by Labor) pages http://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/files/pamphlet/the-case-for-voting-no.pdf?v=1.1
All the gaps in the pages will likely have NICE PICTURES expensively funded by we Tax Payers.
Concerning the last page, remember children, if someone can hit a tennis ball well they are authorities on complex politico-legal issues.

and

- the perfectly reasonable "No" case in 7 pages http://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/files/pamphlet/the-case-for-voting-no.pdf?v=1.1

Cheers Mavs

WHOOPSY CORRECTION! HAD YOUSE GOING THERE ;)

Hi All

What we've all been waiting for:

Here are the Voice Yes and No cases just published on the Australian Electoral Commission site today. These are the:

- "Yes" case in 13 unfortunately, poorly formatted (by Labor) pages http://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/files/pamphlet/the-case-for-voting-yes.pdf?v=1.0

and

- the sound "No" case in 7 pages http://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/files/pamphlet/the-case-for-voting-no.pdf?v=1.1

Cheers Mavs

Hi All,

Constitutional law experts should be the ones we need
to listen to. And most support the YES case and see no
problem with doing that.

The Australian Financial Review tells us that
"Leading Constitutional Law expert Greg Craven
will complain to the Australian Electoral Commission
after MPs against the Voice and against Indigenous
having a Voice to Parliament used his quotes in an essay
against the body.

These shameful tactics are now becoming the norm in
Australian politics.

Here's another link giving details of Constitutional law
experts and the legal tick they give to the Voice to
Parliament submission:

http://theguardian.com/world-news/2023/apr/14/constitutional-expert-gives-legal-tick-to-indigenous-voice-in-parliamentary-submission

Sorry for the typo. Here's the link again:

http://theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/14/constitutional-expert-gives-legal-tick-to-indigenous-voice-in-parliamentary-submission

Foxy, High-profile people are to be believed in what they say in public otherwise they are irrelevant.