The Forum > General Discussion > Are The Opposition Parties Dead In The Water?
Are The Opposition Parties Dead In The Water?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
There is no tantrum from me, just the opposite. You say its only a matter of time and the opposition will somehow resurrect itself, and past history vindicates that. I somewhat disagree, in the majority of cases, post WWII, it has required the arrival of a strong forceful style leader to give confidence to the electorate to embrace change. I believe both Whitlam and Hawke for Labor, Menzies and Howard for the Liberals had the necessary characteristics. There were a series of men who as Opposition leader failed to engender confidence in the electorate with their lacklustre leadership, Calwell, Lathum, Hayden and Shorten for Labor, and Snedden, Peacock, Nelson and Downer for the Liberals were all poorly performing leaders who really were not PM material and their parties in some cases suffered longer periods than necessary in Opposition, because of that leadership failing.
Looking at the present federal Opposition, led by a complete dud in Dutton, and a glance at his front bench of total incompetence, it may take another decade in the wilderness before the 'Noalition' returns to power. That's if another party or group doesn't usurp their place as the official opposition to Labor.