laurie: I apologise for misrepresenting you.
realist: A bigot? not really but I do not like PAGANS [by Bible definition , they call us unbeleivers and infidels and preach our demise]claim that islam is a religion of peace when it is not that at all. Not all islamics are terrorist but over 95% of terrorists are islamic. Your not a bleeding heart and I'm not a moron. Your as tough as nails - well bully for you!
When someone tenders blatant lies I respond whether he/she is Christian or heathen [you don't like pagan]
Abuse or the truth? I have not attacked a person I have attacked a death loving man made religion that calls for the death of ALL unbelievers. I do attack a man made religion which not only lauds cowardly suicide bombers but encourages them. I do attack a man made religion that decapitates young Christian schoolgirls because of their religion. I do attack a man made brutal religion that beheads civilian captives. I do attack a man made religion which destroys embassies.I do attack a cowardly man made religion which starves and callously slays innocent Russian schoolchildren. Turn on your TV and read a newspaper or listen and/or read a foul anti-western sermon from a pagan preacher in a pagan temple. numbat

Desperately need people with ethnic background to answer a survey!

I'm a Finnish girl writing a Thesis about effects of ethnicity on employment in Australia and I'd truly appreciate if someone is interested to help me out. If so, contact me : pearl80@jippii.fi and I'll send you the questionnaire by e-mail. won't take longer than a couple of minutes!

Laurie

Your post can't go unanswered. There are several fatal flaws within it, and I don't mean to be rude but you appear extremely naive.

Salam Zreika is a racist through & through. For you not to pick up on that through her revolting comments that "Muslims are Australian except we don't get drunk and have sex before marriage".

Look to the subtle Laurie.

Further, nobody judges All Muslims. The only examples I've seen of this is of judging an entire culture because a few people of that culture drew some cartoons.

It's not about moderates denouncing extremists Laurie. If you've watched Insight Forums over the years you will know that the moderates intrinsically defend the extremists. Only on 30-8-05 an Insight forum where the bigot American sheik, Yassin, commented that Muslims can't have non-Muslims for friends, and so on, he said the media did a "SOUNDBITE" on him.

All the Islamic representatives there, including the President of Muslim Councils, all clapped. Could you imagine the outcry if our leaders clapped after a comment by, say, David Irving - the holocaust denier?

Moreover, mainstream clerics are yet to denounce Bin Laden. After the meeting late last year of John Howards Muslim council (who, by the way haven't been able to agree on anything and may be about to split up alltogether. The head of it, Dr. Ameer Ali, believes that the topic of extremism isn't worth discussing at all, for an example of the madness) journalist Matt Price asked the 13 to condemn Bin Laden. Most smiled and refused, walking off, but three spoke.

All wouldn't, with the most insane comment going to the moderate Sheik Fehmi, of Melbourne. He said "I can't condemn Bin Laden because I don't know him".

Think about what that means mate. Think about how disgusting it is that Muslims across Australia haven't demanded he, Sheik Hilali, Sheik Feiz (the women deserve to be raped Sheik), and the scores of others that have said appalling things yet NEVER has there been a protest to remove them.

Muslims sure no how to protest, we saw it over a bloody cartoon. So they obviously don't want to protest against him.

Add to this the fact that Sheik Omran (another Bin Laden lover) has a readership of 10000 and you should start to see where we are coming from.

FELLOW HUMAN

I agree with you, I know the Israelis were terrorists before 1948, and that some communities lived in peace with Muslims.

I personally believe Jerusalem should be run by the UN, as a sort of Vatican City type thing, it's own state perhaps.

I'm not certain but isn't it true that Muslims built that mosque over top of the Jews most sacred site? I know they believe Mohammed was taken there when he ascended (if you ask me he was taken for a ride by aliens - which is what i believe the star of bethlehem may have been.

Any thoughts?

Hamas released a 220-page volume entitled: "Participating in Political Life in the shadow of Contemporary Regimes" written by Musheir al Masarai. I have included a couple of paragraphs Remember all pagan islam is one state that is why to renounce islam is seen as treason and incurs the death penalty.
Quote: The book opens with a directive to hamas to "follow the prophet's example when it concludes temporary pacts [with non-moslems] to gain an opportunity for strengthening and expanding islam". Why? Because, in the course of time, when hamas [or ANY moslem organisation] is strong enough and reaches the right path it will be free to violate those accords as mohamad did.- It's called
"al taqiyya"
Quote: " When flexibility serves its ultimate objective of [my capitals] IMPOSING MOSLEM LAW in all the lands it rules - and those lands it aspires to expand. Hamas will therefore accept even long term ceasefires or non-belligerency arrangements [my capitals] AS LONG AS SUCH DEALS OFFER THE ISLAMIST ORGANISATION A CHANCE TO ENHANCE ITS STRENGTH"
Trust pagan moslems?- sure can't. PS What a sorry, shamefull man-made lying pagan religion eh? numbat

Laurie and others.....

I hope to God you all noticed and noted Numbats QUOTES from Hamas.....

That is straight from the pit of HELL.... it comfirms EVERYthing we have been saying all along.. and underlines it and places a 100 exclamation marks after it....

It could not be stated more forcefully by even a non muslim. Strange how our 'attacks/accusations and tirades' are in fact actually mirror imaged in the Hamas document. Instead of we 'charging' that they believe thus and so, they themselves are showing the true nature of Islam in their own documents.

One key point in their document is 'Following the example of the prophet'....in making temporary truces, treaties etc.. with the GOAL
of advancing Islams final triumph, clearly by IMPOSING its rule.

Israel would be quite within its rights (humanly speaking) to declare full scale final and 'take no prisoners' including women and children against Hamas right now. If one wants to gain an inkling into why God commanded the Israelites to 'utterly destroy' the Canaanites, all you have to do is look at Hamas and the fanatacism, the brainwashing of babies with toy Kalashnikovs, the lying videos etc.. to the point where the total community has been shaped into one huge 'bomb'.

If this is how Hamas acts now, imagine how they would act if the Mosque was destroyed and replaced by the Jewish Temple ? just think.

The driving force in Hamas is 'Islam'....not land justice. The withdrawal from Gaza and the documents quoted by Numbat clearly show this.

So, our attacks on Islam, are nothing to do with paranoia, hate, mental difficulties, recent input from National Socialist cell meetings, or even a 'bad day'...they are the accurate, focused and truthful exposure of that which is now clearly admitted by Hamas.