Ribbit,

KAEP is an acronym for Kyoto Alternative Energy Protocol. It has four parts: Power from space based dynamos, laser drilling for geothermal power to replace coal, nanotechnology for development of low polluting transport (non-static, aggressive fuel cells) and agricultural power(thermoelectric shadecloth) and engineered wetland climate change buffering based on Morse theory applied to harmonic distribution of land/sea thermodynamic imbalances.

I would like to see all nations contribute half% GDP to a KAEP plan over 10 years to see if we can provide a credible fossil fuel alternative as well as a regularisation of space travel and as a safety valve for 6.5 billion people (plus 150million extra each year) to get off of this planet. KAEP will create hi-tech education and jobs and benifit world economics but has the downside of evening out social injustice. Current economic models are dependent on slave clients (economic injustice) to create market share and wealth for minorities. I would like that to change. Political enough for you? I am not holding my breath but either way I believe KAEP can still work for all concerned.

You tend to go along with the opinion of Bjorn Lomborg in his book “The Sceptical Environmentalist”, but as people become wealthier, they want bigger markets and more underlings to buy their products. This is UNSUSTAINABLE even if KAEP were to occur and was a 100% success.

I do not like your unsustainable politics sir. Perhaps you have just not thought it through properly or do not have the world experience to understand what 6.5 million with 20% non replaceable usage really means. However, your assessment of effete IPCC proofs for global warming has my undying approval. A .2 degC rise in REGIONAL temperatures becoming 10 degree-global-rises over 50 years is a population control freak's wet dream.

I think its pretty clear to all readers of Froggies political bias.

KAEP, do the poem thing about that IPCC again. That's my favourite. You know the one, "Will the real IPCC please step forward.

It can't? Oh dear!

The 'IPCC's passed on?

This Greenhouse warming nonsense is no more! It has ceased to be!

'IPCC's expired and gone to meet its maker! 'IPCC's a stiff! Bereft of life,it rests in peace!

If I hadn't nailed it to the perch the IPCC'd be still pushing up scientific confusions!

'Its metabolic processes are now history!

'IPCC's off the twig"

Yeah that was great, it brings tears to my eyes.

Only I think the links others posted in response to your claims punched a few holes in your theories. Do you have anymore?

Burger,

I was wondering if you were a Big Mac or a Wimpy. Now I know.

NO One has punched holes in my theory, least of all yourself.

Global warming is a non-starter and climate changes are all about RECCEs. REGIONAL Ectopic Climate Catastrophe Events.

Put up WImPCC off.

Hallo Burger
Yes, I am also politically biased, I must admit it...
When we are talking about social justice, are we talking about equality of opportunity or equality of outcome? If it's the former, then I would agree with you.
On the other hand, I do think that certain people are able to manipulate things to get a skewed (in their favour) outcome. Unfortunately it is all too human, and has been so ever since human society existed. What would you suggest as a solution?
I find all of KAEP's posts hilarious too.
You must admit that he or she has a really DIFFERENT viewpoint about things.

Frogman,

Rudely speaking past me as if I didn't exist is a sure sign that you have NO ammunition to support your ludicrous case for growing wealth, PYRAMID style with yourself as high up in the pyramid as you can claw and scratch. Even in lemming populations that strategy works for king pin lemmings and to the overall good. That is, until the crunch point comes where population numbers are such that consumption exceeds supply and catastrophe is unleashed. This catastrophe WILL occur for human civilisation as well and when the crunch comes you cannot be sure you will be on the prevailing side. NO-ONE can, idiot!

Nice try to convince others of your deceit but you are clearly out-of-your-depth and inexperienced in world matters. With 6.5 million people, 150 million extra each year and a 20% non replaceable environmental and natural resource usage deficit each year, we are very close to crunch time.

If knowledge is power vis a vis the coming crunch, and you continue in ignorance, I personally wouldn't be betting on your chances of survival.

On the other hand, the following article may indicate that future survivors all end up learning Chinese:

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Fonechild-policy-will-remain-despite-abuses%2F2006%2F03%2F22%2F1142703443057.html&t=4&n=7&s=population

"Zhang Weiqing, National Population and Family Planning Commission director, vigorously defended the policy in an online forum, saying that without it China would have had 400 million more people to feed, house and educate."
"If we included these 400 million people, could we achieve xiaokang (a prosperous society) in general? I don't think so," Mr Zhang said. "We've taken only 30 years to almost achieve what developed countries have done with population-control targets in 100 years