The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > I hate Nicole Kidman > Comments

I hate Nicole Kidman : Comments

By Adriana Maxwell, published 10/1/2005

Adrianna Maxwell explains why she hates Nicole Kidman

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 65
  7. 66
  8. 67
  9. Page 68
  10. 69
  11. 70
  12. 71
  13. ...
  14. 118
  15. 119
  16. 120
  17. All
Ah, their regular Aussie road show and photo Op. huh? Yeah, whats best for me is being from the states, I can pretty much bypass the aussie saturation coverage... but I did check out the stories in a google news search though. And your right wakings, her lips are juiced again... saw a very hilarious photo of them both at some show, with her nephew. Urbans sitting to her right, the nephews sitting on his lap looking bored, and botoxic in the back, wearing huge sunglasses, a cap, over the obvious looking wig, looking pretty embarrassed by the whole situation. Obviously the photo Op only required the one kid... or just the one who would agree to go along, and besides, that way she can consign him to urban, while she can contemplate ... on herself.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 4:33:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Just to let you all know Botox and KU were at the Royal Easter Show in Sydney yesterday with her nephew. Its certainly not the place for privacy, I smell the PR machine turning here.Does she realise she has two adopted children in this world as well?
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 8:07:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
thanks for the info wakings... obviously cruises adoptive kids werent available for her PR stunt...
Well, heres some more proof that whatever botoxic touches, turns out to really suck... when Warner Bros. got a look at the final version of The Invasion, botixics next movie, they thought it was so "dull and talky" they ordered reshoots. (That does sound like the usual kidman drivel doesnt it?) Now, remember, the shooting for this film began in 2005! The director ,Oliver Hirshbiegel was unavailable, so the studio brought in the Wachowski Bros. to punch up the movies action... hence the aforementioned car stunt, with zombies on board accident a month ago. Looks like the studio was keeping an eye out for another kidman pretentious crash and burn film... now only if they will be smart enough to keep her face off the movie poster...
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 9:40:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thats interesting Maclean
Is it usual for a director not to want to return and fix up what the big wigs want? I think if you worked on a project you would want to be involved with it to the end. Do you know why the director was unavailable and where to you get your information?Maybe his leading actress was too much hard work? he he he
If I remember correctly it took 2 years for 'Eyes Wide Shut' to complete and the the director said it ws because his two leading actors were to interfering.
So 'The Invasion' another NK movie to avoid thanks fo the tip I don't think I was planning to watch it anyway.
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 9:12:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well, Wakings, when i read your post about kidman and urban being spotted on Australia, i just did a google news search , and i saw this story...http://www.collider.com/entertainment/news/article.asp?aid=4017&tcid=1
...its not known why the director was unavailable, but naturally I would just suspect that he refused to do the reshoots. Yes, Eyes wide Shut was a mess, but also recall that Stepford Wives also had a troubled shooting as well. This is not at all surprising to me, seeing that kidman seems to be a very bland and robotic actress, i can just imagine that she simply has her people and agents lining up these scripts, and she just learns the lines, shows up on the set, does what the director tells her and then moves on to the next script. It also seems noticable that these days she seems to be doing alot less PR for her movies.. for Fur, for instance, all she did was appear at the Rome film festival, with not one talk show, or magazine interviews... she seems to have come to the realization that it is futile in the case of her movies...
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 5:51:00 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It is very possible that the original director doesn't want his name attached to a flop. This has happened before. The director having nothing but trouble either with the company or the actors throwing tantrums etc and insisting on doing it their way (Russell CRowe does this constantly.) In the end, after working for months on a film being dictated to by egotistical 'stars', not allowing him/her to do the job he was hired to do...that is, directing...the director, totally disheartened, just gives up. It can happen out of disillusionment or out of anger, and they just walk away and don't want their name attached to the film. It would be interesting to find out if this was the case. Having worked on films/television series with Kidman, admittedly many years ago when she was much younger, I witnessed extreme frustration from director and crew over her demands and snooty behaviour. Behaviour like this impacts on crew, as well as the other actors. It's hard on everyone involved.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 8:00:09 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 65
  7. 66
  8. 67
  9. Page 68
  10. 69
  11. 70
  12. 71
  13. ...
  14. 118
  15. 119
  16. 120
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy