Loudmouth, a couple of IT contractors that were employed for the
election. They found the there was a connection to a network.

I think under our electoral system, if such was found the court of
disputed returns would have cancelled the result and sent it back to the electors.
Anyway it appears that it is going to court.
Some seem determined that nothing should be tested, nothing to see here, move along !
Anyway, if there is fiddling with the ballot it should be exposed.
These two were not happy with what they saw.

http://tinyurl.com/y336ugzc

A bit more Loudmouth;
In this tally centre everyone was sent home for the night, but four
stayed behind and restarted counting. It was all on video.
A bit hard to see here on the internet but the lady describing the
events to the audience would have had a better vision, but you can
see them pull suitcases out from under a table.
No matter what you believe and if you support any candidate then
fraud is a distinct possibility and should be examined.

https://tinyurl.com/y3dxwscw

I did see a graph of the allocation of votes during a day and it
showed spikes of near equal size for both candidate then at the
end of the day a big spike for Biden much bigger than any previous spike.
Well it will provide a lot of entertainment for the next four years.
Just be thankful that we have a much better system.

SR,

"Well there you are my little fellow"

Little?....you shouldn't believe the rumours.

"You took a bit of a break for a month didn't you."
Yep, caravan tour of NSW timed to beat the Christmas hoards. Sans devices as instructed by the boss.

Paul_etc

Still struggling with those pesky facts I see....

"a mild flu said Donald and mhaze..." Well no one said it was a mild flu. But the equivalent of a bad flu season.

"it only affects old people..." Well no one said it ONLY affects old people just that it primarily affects old people. I'd mention the numbers but I know you'd get lost once we got above 10.

" dose of diso will do the trick..." Well no one said that but facts be damned, eh Paul.

"Dangerous Doctor Donald lost the election ..." Well as I said, he won the election but lost the count.

INCREASINGLY detached from reality, President Donald Trump stood before a White House lectern

and delivered a 46-minute diatribe against the election results that produced a win for

Joe Biden, unspooling one misstatement after another to back his baseless claim that he really won.

Trump called his address, released [2 Dec 2020] only on social media and delivered in front of no audience,

perhaps “the most important speech” of his presidency.

But it was largely a recycling of the same litany of misinformation and unsubstantiated allegations

of voter fraud that he has been making for the past month.
_____________________

There you have it Trump's Pets of Unreality.

More at http://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-media-social-media-elections-71d5469ac0bbccbfe601528a2517b239 of 3rd December 2020

"unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud..."

http://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/disturbing-video-from-georgia-suitcases-filled-with-ballots/

Well if they don't get investigated they'll remain unsubstantiated.

Funny that. No one wants to look into the credible claims of fraud, but in 2016 they spent 2 years looking into entirely ridiculous assertions of electoral fraud.

And the clowns who fell for those claims then are falling for the assertions that there was no fraud this time

Mhaze.

Oy. Present the evidence before a court - or first present the basic outlines of what would count as evidence, and then wait for the court's decision. So far, in both Republican- and Democrat-controlled administrations, no such presentations have been made which carried any weight with their court systems.

This is getting so childish: 'we assert, therefore you must believe - and the more outrageous the assertions are, the more you must believe.'

It doesn't work that way. Sorry, kids.

Joe