The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Electoral fraud revealed in Michigan > Comments

Electoral fraud revealed in Michigan : Comments

By David Singer, published 30/11/2020

The same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud writ large occurred in all the swing states with only minor variations in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Wisconsin.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. All
Just an addition thought, an election officer could insert a hundred
or so ballots into the scanner upside down, they would all be rejected
and would be in the computer for adjudication as they call it.
All could be set as a vote for Biden or Trump.
Probably other tricks that the operators would be well aware of.
Perhaps some of us could get together and offer the Greens the government !
Posted by Bazz, Wednesday, 16 December 2020 7:05:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Perhaps some of us could get together and offer the Greens the government !" Who are the some of us Bazz, the Neo-Nazi's? Better suggestion, get the redundant dictator your man Trump to take over Australia.

As for the perhaps this or that nonsense, anything is possible. In the case of the American election all the non-partisan independent analysis of the 150 million vote is it was carried out fairly and the result was legitimate. Trump can jump up and down all he likes but at the end of the day he LOST fair and square.
Posted by Paul1405, Thursday, 17 December 2020 7:08:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well Paul, on the figures you think he lost.
But wouldn't that be the purpose of the fiddle ?
The point I am making is that on the publicly available information
it would be easy to fake the results.
It does require the active intervention of the operator.
It has a facility to do a 3 to 2 adjustment to what it reads.
That is a documented feature apparently.
Knowing this it relies on very close scrutiny by the appointed
scrutineers from the parties.
As they were held at a distance and then sent home while some stayed
behind and counted ballots, you can perhaps, if you let your bias go,
find room to admit there is doubt !
There are a number of enquiries into the system so the truth will out.
Here is one report; test your impartiality !
http://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report
Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 17 December 2020 7:52:37 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bazz, nothing is going to satisfy you of the far right the Biden won in a landslide (Trumps 2016 words). So get over it, Trump had his day in court and LOST. The issue now should be how does the Republican Party divest itself of the Trump cancer over the next four years. Any ideas?
Posted by Paul1405, Thursday, 17 December 2020 10:44:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Bazz,

I think I get your logic: because a fiddle may have been possible, THEREFORE it happened. and only for the benefit of Democrat votes..

Prove it. Asseritur gratis, negatur gratis.

Joe
Posted by loudmouth2, Thursday, 17 December 2020 11:08:01 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
No Paul & Loudmouth, you are making the assumption that there was no fiddle.
I am saying on the face of reports on the system and videos there COULD have been a fiddle.
I have no way of saying there was or wasn't.
You both however are saying there wasn't ! Show that or is it wishful thinking on your part ?
There is sworn evidence that there was so it should be looked into.
Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 17 December 2020 12:39:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy