The Forum > Article Comments > The awful funeral > Comments
The awful funeral : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 14/3/2014We now attend funerals in which a number of speakers are let loose on the congregation tolling the virtues of the deceased, often blubbering into the microphone as they read scripts spat out by computer printers.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
We define concepts, not objects or phenomena outside of us that the concepts are supposed to relate to. If I define the term “an Australian” as a person who can carry an Australian passport, I say practically nothing about the millions of Australians, each one a different personality, only about how I (and others) understand the concept of being “an Australian”.
In my opinion the “neti, neti principle” relates to what Christians call apophatic theology, and what I like to express by saying that God, whoever/whatever He is, is beyond the reach of scientific investigation.
So I think I understand what you mean. Neither Eastern nor Western mystics want to “define” - in order to communicate to others - their experience of God or the Spiritual, which is beyond rational analysis, where definitions have their place.
All I wanted to point out was that you can hardly make yourself understood by others when your recommendations sound like “you should worship your own delusions”.