The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Gay marriage: an argument against > Comments

Gay marriage: an argument against : Comments

By Peter Sellick, published 1/8/2012

Gender division cannot simply be erased because gays want to push their egalitarian agenda to the last bastion: marriage.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. All
Shadow Minister,
Atrocity stories are usually fabricated and human nature does not change, Homosexuals commit vastly more crime per head than non Homosexuals, they are 100 times as likely to be murdered, their median age of death is around 40, they are more likley to be drug addicts or alchoholics, they are 12 times as likely to have been raped by a person of the same sex,even the rate at which they die in car accidents is dozens of times higher than straight people.
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/violence-and-homosexuality/
Crime and "Gay" lifestyles go hand in hand, punishment for serious crimes was far more brutal in days gone by, it stands to reason that "Gays" would be burned, flogged, hanged and incarcerated at rates vastly higher than those of heterosexuals.
The "Gay" is the outsider, the hustler, the mountebank, the sexual aggressor, it's a transgressive, violent, outlaw lifestyle. Every Gay I've ever know well has been a crook, has been violent when intoxicated, chronically unreliable and shifty and we need not even mention drugs and the "Gay" scene. If I hadn't been a heavy drug user myself I, like most straight people would never have been exposed to uninhibited "Gay" lifestyles, now we're surely not going to sit here and say that the majority of "Gays" are just like Cam and Mitchell from Modern Family, the idea is laughable.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 2 August 2012 7:40:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jay of Melbourne, you must know that the citation given is hopelessly biased, and its methodology unscientific. Doesn't mention the notorious "Dr" Paul Cameron by any chance? Using this citation means that you have not done any research in to the sources and provenance of your citation. Lazy response.
Posted by Doug, Thursday, 2 August 2012 8:00:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Marriage is not legal until the binding contracts are signed after the church service . Therefore the romanticised religious concept of marriage is not Legal anyway.

Lets do away with the fairytale unreality and just sign the binding contracts. Those contracts should be a lot more comprehensive in regards to the financial Partnership of marriage and the legals regarding equal share of care for the children.

No problem for the gays if civil contracts were the norm or is there? The government still may not grant them equal rights under those contracts.
Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 2 August 2012 8:25:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Eric G, Or not, young buck. I have read plenty about anatomy and development. If you're born a male, you're a male. If you're born a female, you're a female. End of story. Your gender is determined at about two weeks in and it never changes. Go read a book that was NOT written by a socialist. Nazi books never did anyone any good.

Why do lefties always change the subject when they get slammed by the truth? Gender in no way determines sexual preference, so why bother bringing up trans-gender? Trans-gender is a birth defect and is not associated with homosexuality; homosexuality is a self-destructive choice made decades after birth.

@Doug, Everything pro-gay is hopelessly biased, so what's your point? You're just pissed because Jay has a credible source and the best that you could even hope to come up with is some nutty left-winger site, like Pew Research.
Posted by TheTruth, Thursday, 2 August 2012 8:43:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Doug,
The information in that article comes from pro Gay sources, the site It's sourced from is irrelevant since these Judeo Christian groups don't do any research of their own, the only way to get information on homosexual lifestyles is to read the research being done to gather support for greater state management of their health and wellbeing.
Again, I'm not anti homosexual, I'm opposed to the Judeo Christian state orthodoxy which is being pushed by the pro Homosexual movement,because like every other official point of view it's based on the lie of "equality".
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 4 August 2012 6:44:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jay, and TheTruth,

I hereby award you the White hat (with gold stars) award for the most Red-neck bigoted behaviour possible. I have never seen such a collection of bigoted lies in one place. Your Klan members must be very proud.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 4 August 2012 7:45:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy