The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Should Andrew Laming Resign?

Should Andrew Laming Resign?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All
Will no one rid me of this turbulent pest ?"
Posted by Bazz, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 8:41:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
...... turbulent pest ?"
Bazz,
it's just his limp wrists that make his fingers flail uncontrollably over the key board, hence so much nonsense !
Posted by individual, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 9:25:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear mhaze,

Being a drop kick again I see.

You wrote: “If what he said was demonstrably wrong, as is claimed, she'd sue for defamation. She's not. I think we can all work out why.”

Laming was quite careful with his words as most trollers are. He did not accuse her directly just repeatedly insinuated things.

"You can't be trusted with other people's' (sic) money. That's why your organisation is drying up,"

"Thankfully, they all left you and set up an alternative charity. Unfortunately for you, I make the rules and you follow them."

There hasn't been the slightest indication of an investigation into the charity by anyone, something you would think would happen if there was any truth to this.

The guy is a nasty piece of work and the fact your ideology means you have leapt to his defence shows it for what it is.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 9:40:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Bazz,

«However any man here that has seen an attractive girl/woman and never
had thoughts about her is a bloody liar !
If not a liar then he needs to see a doctor.
It is after all built in to our DNA.«

Actually not.
Actually, this is a result of social conditioning.

DNA attracts men to have sex (when conditions are appropriate, when healthy, when there is sufficient food), not to take photographs. It also operates mainly through the sense of smell (pheromones), rather than visually.

Society distorted nature, preferring vision over smell because it is easier to see one's social class than to smell it, so by social training, someone who does not belong to the same social class does not even seem "attractive". One of the powerful tactics used by classed societies, was to hide certain body parts, turning them into taboos, meanwhile setting boys and young men against each other in competition, triggering their natural curiosity to reveal what is forcibly hidden from the eye and judging them as "successful" when they manage to see and "conquer". This is even more apparent in Muslim societies where even the women's faces are covered, or in the old Chinese society where girl's feet where covered.

This may have worked in old days when they wanted to encourage procreation within one's class, but nowadays, not only do we want to break the barriers between social classes, but procreation itself in this far too crowded corner of the universe, has become a crime against nature and the planet we live in.

The way forward is therefore to stop the fuss around body-looks early on in life, turning it all into "no big deal".
Nudity (sensibly subject to weather conditions) should be normalised and toilets/showers should be shared for all ages. In Germany where this is the case, sexual drive is at its lowest because it is not driven by curiosity.
When that happens, Laming's behaviour will no longer offend anyone, just seem utterly uselessly stupid.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 12:16:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Old Farts, yes you Usual Suspects, you residents down at 'Shady Pines Retirement Village', where the policy is "NO Chicks Allowed" you know who you are. Nursey is confiscating all your Mobile Phones this morning to have a look at what you been up to. Remember your trip to the beach last Thursday, well some girls have complained. Nursey will check out your happy snaps! Lookout, me thinks some of you fellas are going to be banned from the Parcheesi game for a month, and we know how much you guys look forward to Tuesday morning Parcheesi.
Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 5:21:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul1405,

Looks like a case of 'Evil thinkers, evil doers.'

The Forum's Old Farts are all dyed-in-the-wool LNP supporters and always willing to turn a blind eye to the deviant behaviour of their peers.

Actually, it's quite sick.

I can't wait to see what else is going to come out in the news about LNP deviancy. It just seems to get worse every minute.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 6:35:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy