The Forum > General Discussion > Should Andrew Laming Resign?
Should Andrew Laming Resign?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by SteeleRedux, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 11:11:55 AM
| |
NEWS FLASH
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9421033/Michael-Johnsen-resigns-NSW-Parliament-sexting-allegations.html?ito=push-notification&ci=113052&si=28036895&ai=9421033 Now what will The Lemming do? Over the cliff you go the crowd does shout! Posted by Mr Opinion, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 11:25:03 AM
| |
Gotta laugh. I point out that SR always starts any fact free post with an ad hominem and he responds by starting his next fact free post with an ad hominem.
There's no evidence either way as to whether Alix Russo was pocketing some of the takings from the Night Ninjas. She says no but offers no proof. He suggested yes but offered no proof. If you want to decide he's lying because you think anyone with a penis and who's to the right of Mao always lies, then knock yourself out. I prefer the option of 'don't know'. Its just interesting that if the genders were reversed there'd be yawns all round. Posted by mhaze, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 1:29:54 PM
| |
Andrew Laming has sealed his own fate.
He's quitting politics and will end up on the ash heap of history. In a short while few will remember him. I feel sorry for his family. But I doubt if his behaviour will change. Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 1:37:31 PM
| |
cont'd ...
Of course Andrew Laming is not going to resign. It would cost Mr Morrison's Coalition its parliamentary majority. The man has a long history of his constituents complaining about online abuse, not counting the recent allegations against him. But hey - he's just a bloke doing blokey things right? Wrong! Time to tell him - on your bike mate! Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 2:05:21 PM
| |
mhaze
You might laugh, but surely by now you are convinced that he is too far gone to waste your time with his ravings? Posted by ttbn, Wednesday, 31 March 2021 2:31:43 PM
|
Being a snowflake yet again. Why is it such a feature of your side of politics, most notably when you have no rebuttal to the arguments put.
You basically claimed because someone who is a single mother and employed as a charity worker doesn't have the wherewithal to mount a defamation case, something usually reserved for the well off, she must be guilty of fraud.
That is indeed something an unempathetic drop kick would do.
I pointed out Laming was careful with his wording making mounting a defamation case even more difficult yet you called it nothing with no explanation as to why.