The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Should Andrew Laming Resign?

Should Andrew Laming Resign?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All
Is there ever a man with a soul so dead that he would not have thought, ohhhh whoooo !
Posted by Bazz, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 1:30:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
In defence of The Lemming, Bazz just said:

"Maybe the lady involved should rethink her work clothes!"

Goodness gracious, it's getting worse every minute.

Now that LNP sexual deviancy has been exposed for the world to see they are all starting to come out of the woodwork.

Don't worry Bazz, you're not alone. For every one of you there are another thousand out there.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 1:47:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
He could have been a murderer, he could deserve to be hanged, but what gives anyone a right to punish his voters?

We vote in order to try to preserve our freedom, to try to protect ourselves from the state and stop it from passing draconic laws against us. In Laming's absence (for example), perhaps parliament could legislate it being compulsory to always wear the left shoe before the right, making it a criminal offense to wear the right shoe first - so where goes all the effort of the people of his electorate who voted for being able to wear their shoes in any order they like?

In a democracy (though this concept itself is far from ideal), people should be able to vote for the actual issues that affect their lives rather than for silly (and often criminal) personalities. Now if they wish to do so through a representative and that representative proves inadequate in any manner, then it is them and them alone who should replace him/her/it, which they should be able to do at any time!
Posted by Yuyutsu, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 2:11:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi bazza,

The old adage of she was asking for it is no longer a good
Excuse.

There will always be people who will behave badly. Male and
Female.

However we need to educate children from an early age on
What is right and what is not.
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 2:13:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Bazz,

Nice bit of victim blaming going on there from you. Before that it was the warning of the consequence of discussion. You can't be in "contempt of court" when there is no case to be contemptible about. Classic hard right defence, blame the victim, are you on the Laming defence team? BTW a bit of a look at Laming's record in parliament, been there 17 years and other than being a parliamentary "oxygen thief" his achievements amount to a big fat zero in my book. Morrison wants him sitting there in the parliament doing nothing else than voting the Morrison way, and at the same time sucking off the taxpayer teat with a big fat salary.
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 4:01:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Laming claims he wasn't photographing her backside at all but instead recording someone who was trying to pack more in a 'frig than the 'frig could hold. Who knows? But its a reasonable claim and in the old days we used to have this thing called innocent until proven guilty. Ahhhh the good old days. When was that?

BTW she was wearing shorts. Can you up-skirt someone who isn't wearing a skirt?

As I mentioned elsewhere, Laming is also accused of harassing a women about claims she stole from her charity. Her response? Threaten suicide. If what he said was demonstrably wrong, as is claimed, she'd sue for defamation. She's not. I think we can all work out why.

In this current environment, having a penis is prima facie evidence of guilt of whatever womxn accuse. That is unless you have a penis but also wear a dress in which case you are beyond reproach.

Demoting Porter was a disaster for future good governance. Forcing Laming to leave parliament before the next election would compund the error.
Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 4:44:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy