yep regressives always believe what they want to be true rather than facts or truth itself. Sad part is that is how the abc now reports.

Josephus,

<<The only facts that can be defined are the testimonies of the witness.>>

What testimonies do you have of witnesses to Captain Cook's voyage up the east coast of what was to become Australia in 1770.

Does that mean we know zero facts about the voyage of James Cook on The Endeavour?

Fake news fake views is an illness, see those here defending it, know as increasing numbers do, Trump is quite a criminal
Know too if we saw Russia or China lead by such a man the VICTIMS of Trump's fraudulent Presidency would call for blood
Funny weird the way his VICTIMS use fake claims it is me who has been misled
Time is on my side a day will come post Trump, when I remind them they brought a fraud
Too on that day question can some be trusted to understand or respect the truth

OzSpen, We have eye witness accounts of Cook's voyage; what are you talking about?
______________________________________

Belly, watch the impeachment itself and draw your conclusions. Your short coming is you will believe nothing else but that Trump is a criminal. You state it over and over without a trial.

The Trial is happening, and when the star witness used the words "Quid pro Quo" Schiff ran to the media mike and stated it was all over. So the Media release went out - Trump is guilty. CNN, USA today and MSN immediately reported it. However the witness Gordon Sondland was then cross examined, and stated it was his impression the money would be withheld till a report of corruption on the Biden's.

However it was merely his impression, the fact was that Trump would withhold a meeting with the President of Ukraine until they established if there had been corruption under the previous administration. The president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky stated there was no "Quid Pro Quo" attached to the withholding of the $5B Ukraine Defence. It was granted no strings attached.

What was withheld was a meeting of Trump with the President of Ukraine until they had any evidence of corruption by the bankrupt company that employed Hunter Biden.

Just one last thing, Belly, before I leave you to wallow in your ignorance. You wrote: "MHAZE let me tell you while Sky/Fox makes your opinions mine are my own"

I don't watch either of those. All of my data comes from print media and blogs. I have 11 favoured sites, some of which are anti-Trump, anti-West, that I visit every day (except when I'm on the operating table!!). I have a further 26 sites that I scan every couple of days. I also have a series of favoured journalists and have a programme which searches the WWW each day to find anything new from them.

While the majority of my favoured sites are obviously of the right, I deliberately ensure some are of the left, so as to get some balance.

Finally, if I find a favoured source is shown to be wrong too often, I leave.

Just telling you this to give you an inkling as to how to find the truth rather than the propaganda

Josephus,

<<OzSpen, We have eye witness accounts of Cook's voyage; what are you talking about?>>

Eyewitnesses are only part of determining the veracity of what happened in history of 1770 in Australia.

Were the eyewitnesses truthful in their statements? How do you know?

You seem to have missed the point I'm making: We have to engage in historical science to determine what happened with James Coook in 1770.