The Forum > General Discussion > A View of Trump
A View of Trump
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Page 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
"I have neither the time nor the inclination to tease apart even little nuance and dance around the truth you employ in your posts."
No problems there. But don't then turn your lack of rigour into an misunderstood attack on what you think are my views because, when you do that, its a screw-up.
"And please show me where I 'fell' for any myth."
david f
The myth of collusion and that Trump was a patsy and lackey of Putin. Please don't try to suggest you haven't written on that previously.
"He has acerbated hatred of Muslims, Jews..."
Yes we've seen his hatred of Jews in moving the embassy to Jerusalem and recognising the Golan Heights as part of Israel. His son-in-law and grandkids are Jewish. But why am I mentioning facts when they clearly don't matter?
" I believe the increase in hate crimes are a direct result of his incendiary rhetoric."
"The rise in hate crimes is attributed to an increase of about 1,000 police departments that are now choosing to report these incidents, the FBI says."
Who to believe?
BTW I think the increase in hoax hate crimes is due to the lack of actual Trump related hate crimes.
Foxy,
"Or else as they say - put up or ..."
Here you go.... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8353#261842
Actually its interesting that I could do that same post from 9 months ago today, virtually unchanged.
I find it fascinating that people will continue to believe sources who've clearly misled them over and over. But as I said, its about seeking confirmation for pre-judged views and comfort in being told what you want to hear. Its not about seeking the truth.
People like david f can think of Trump as anti-Jewish when the evidence laughs at such a view. Why? Because he wants it to be true, irrespective of the evidence.
SR can simultaneously believe that Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election but also needed to try to open back-channels after the election. Both things can't be true, unless you just want them to be true.
Double-think lives.