david f

do a little research and you will find that scientist got very excited when they first saw aboriginals believing they could well of found the ever elusive missing link. People who believe in the fantasy of evolution often come to wrong conclusions and this was no difference.

'Some 19th- and 20th-century Darwinists thought that all non-Caucasian people were ape-like and therefore inferior to whites. Darwin himself wrote that “at some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes [apes that look human] . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla” (Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, p. 156, 1887).

leftist love to point out the 'sins' of the church while ignoring their complete bigotry based on pseudo science.

runner have you given any thought to your view of Christ? as opposed to the one I learned about in the Bible
It will always be my view the extreme right claiming ownership of Christ will, in time, kill the religion
Maybe Trump is the missing link
Something is missing in the hate filled man
I thought I found in God the hope and reason men wanted, a path to being a better person in a better world
Most Christians still think like that
What is the purpose of a world divided by hate, fear of difference,hate of difference

Question Runner- What would you think of birth control for non-Christian's?

SR,

"And please show me where I 'fell' for any myth."

The myth you fell for was the idea that there was collusion between Trump and Putin to hand Trump the presidency and that therefore Trump was indebted to Putin.

We now know that is utter rubbish. Or rather you now know it. Those of us who weren't stuck dumb with Trump Derangement Syndrome knew it from the outset.

One of the benefits of a sight like this is that it allows people to go back over their past postings to see how their views have changed over time. As I've been trying to get Foxy to recognise, if your previous views have been shown to be utterly wrong you need to understand how you got it so wrong.
In her case, it was because she relies entirely on media that openly barracked against Trump and simply refused to see anything that suggested against collusion. And she willingly and anxiously believed it.

In your case, it was because you simply believe anything that is anti-Trump no matter how ill-informed and that you will spin anything mildly favourable to Trump as being a negative.

As I said in another thread, I was enormously impressed that Belly openly admitted that he got the whole collusion thing wrong. Unfortunately it seems that he isn't going to take the next step and examine why and how he got it so wrong, but owning up is nonetheless to his credit.

It seems that most others are going to pretend they weren't led down the garden path on what is one of the most important stories so far this century - the attempt to overthrown an elected government

Dear mhaze,

Yes indeed the benefits of this forum is the ability to be able to go back and look at other people's position.

So when you state; "The myth you fell for was the idea that there was collusion between Trump and Putin to hand Trump the presidency and that therefore Trump was indebted to Putin." I feel comfortable in your ability to back it up.

I certainly think Putin is so far above Trump in both ability and cunning that he has been repeatedly able to lead him by the nose. It is also evident that Trump has gone out of his way to go easy on Putin by for instance attempting to ease sanctions.

The American justice system felt, as I did, that there was enough reason to initiate an investigation of possible collusion. I fully support both their reasons and in the case of Mueller his professionalism.

Why didn't you?