The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > If this is true some bureaucrats need to be sacked.

If this is true some bureaucrats need to be sacked.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All
Belly I don't judge you, I just point out some of your lies and asinine statements.

Quote "This thread is a fraud, posing as a bucket it has no bottom no sides no truth and will not hold water
Hans-christian Anderson could not write a better child,s story"

** But it is a thread approved by the moderator so you are implying it should not have been approved. Also see last my comment here. **

Lately you are making more references to children, be careful or Elon Musk, will call you out.

Belly Quote "Sanity seems to demand attention as rabid junk replaces honest comment"
** Coming from you that is rich. **

Paul1405 Are you really that naive to believe all public servants are the same, no bad apples in the hundreds of thousands?

What part of this do you not understand "If this is true" I did not state it was true so I do not have to acknowledge your question.

Quote "Some jackass going to the local council offices" You should know that information would not be maintained by a council department.

ttbn made a valid statement like usual you fail to discuss whether the statement is true or false instead you retort with this stupid reply "Surprising what you can read on the back of a public toilet door. ttbn was that next to the message "For a hot time ring Donna on 123456789!"."

Just a side note you all seem to be spending a fair bit of time on this thread, so I win.

NOTICE to the three stooges Belly, Paul1405, SteeleRedux time to put up or shut up. Simply go to the top of the page and hit the little red cross and give your argument of why this thread should be deleted.
You won't do that because to date all your arguments against it amount to zero, you are all hot air with nothing valid to back it up.
Posted by Philip S, Thursday, 17 January 2019 12:44:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
//Simply go to the top of the page and hit the little red cross and give your argument of why this thread should be deleted.//

But I don't think it should be deleted. Just because it's utter codswallop doesn't mean it should be censored, for heaven's sake. Why are tories always so melodramatic?
Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 17 January 2019 1:16:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear philip S,

You write;

"NOTICE to the three stooges Belly, Paul1405, SteeleRedux time to put up or shut up. Simply go to the top of the page and hit the little red cross and give your argument of why this thread should be deleted."

I am sorely cut to the quick. Censor you? No. I was offering friendly advice. You seem hell bent on continually making a fool of yourself so I felt a period of pause and reflection might do you good. No need to keep constantly digging a deeper hole for yourself. Sometimes it is best just to walk away and live to fight another day.

Anyway enough cliches for one day.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Thursday, 17 January 2019 2:58:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
thank you.
Posted by Bella Swan, Thursday, 17 January 2019 3:53:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PS let me be as rude as you, in truth we both should be stopped but it is not going to happen
You constantly insult, but produce rubbish
You over value you ability to think clearly
this thread your every post proves it
Once a long time ago worked with a road worker
He was a lot like you, we called him the Commissioner for main roads
As he sat in the portable lunch shed most of us sat out side in the hot sun or cold wind
He knew every thing, one wet day we invaded his stage for lunch
He set out to tell us the sky was in fact black
We, the whole crew took him on
Proving him wrong, may he rest in peace the silly old fool
*SCREAMED I AM WRONG BUT I AM RIGHT
we never ate in the shed again
Posted by Belly, Thursday, 17 January 2019 3:57:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'm pretty sure I'm not forcing the Daily Mail to print utter crap without bothering to fact check first. They do that all of their own accord.
Toni lavis,
what's the Daily Mail got to do with incompetent, non-performing bureaucrats ?
Some years ago I contacted the CMC to help me with some of the above characters.
Frist contact Adam, a month later after not hearing from Adam I called again. Hi this is Margaret I have taken over from Adam, can you call me again in a month please ? One month later I called & Susan answered & said she'd taken over from Margaret & could I please give her a month to sort through my queries. A month went & I called Susan but Daniel told me he'd taken my case over from Susan but could I please give him a month to get himself familiar with the case. Amonth later i called Daniel but it was Greg who said he'd taken over my cas & yes, could I please give him a month to ..... & so it continued. When I made my 8th call it was Margaret again who just took over my case again & yes a month later I called again. Surprise , surprise it was Margaret who aswered the phone & unfortunately, my case had reached the Statute of limitayion & my case has now been closed.

Toni Lavis, this is not an isolated incident. Do you really think we should have our system work like this ?
Posted by individual, Thursday, 17 January 2019 5:03:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy