The Forum > General Discussion > Religion - Is it finally time to know what you believe is probably wrong?
Religion - Is it finally time to know what you believe is probably wrong?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 55
- 56
- 57
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I also have a copy of Thiering's book. Overall I found it less than convincing but likewise a valuable read. I particular I found her explanations of how the Jews would have understood the virgin birth to be insightful and interesting.
Equally her exploration of the Essene practice of having multiple ways of understanding a particular text was important. (it was mainly this insight that I was thinking of when I wrote my earlier satirical piece to Op2 about 'Animal Farm' ).
However I think she went a little (a lot?) to far with her discoveries and when she started talking of Jesus being the Wicked Priest of the Dead Sea Scrolls, I think she lost a fair bit of credibility. Nonetheless, Australia was worse for her passing a few years back.
If you're interested in this type of thing, another book you might like to track down is The Secret Life Of Jesus by Robert Macklin written around the same time as Theiring's book. Again, an insightful reappraisal of what we know about Jesus from the Bible, the various gospels that didn't make the grade at Nicaea and other texts. To my way of thinking a more satisfying though less well-known book than Theiring's. In it he, for example, using the Talmud to speculate that Jesus was sired by a negro Roman soldier and that this (being mulatto) would explain why he was something of an outcast in Jewish society. Lots of similar things to ponder.