Poirot: I used to enjoy coming here when there was a better balance of views.

So you can bag them, but not put forward any views yourself as you said in you post below.

Poirot: I've never specifically stated on OLO that I repudiate NAZI atrocities during WWII...or the ravages of Attila the Hun...or Caligula.

Hmmm.... so what you are saying poirot is, you never give your own views on anything. You just bag everybody else's.

These are your words, not ones I have supposedly invented.

You won't look at any videos I post because you know that it would prove that Islam is working to take over Australia eventually. Moderates do have these aims also. You wouldn't like to have to admit that they have your covert support.

runner, "The bigoted woman who was on Q&A last representing the socialist was far more dangerous than most of the reclaim supporters"

Correct

The leftist 'Progressives' aka Fabians (the self-titled "Wolves in Sheep's Clothing") aka International Socialists who have already won the cultural war would gag any dissenting voice. Not that there are many people going on Q&A to present an alternative view or even to exercise their freedom of speech. On Q&A any challenge or even questioning of the prevailing political correctness is sneered at, quickly cut and howled down by the audience.

Where does Q&A get its audiences? There always seems to be an abundance of people who swing from the taxpayer's teat in some way or other. Since Whitlam there have been so many with plenty of time on their hands and guvvy incomes/grants to protect.

From reviewing Poirot’s posts in this thread I can see that I was wrong in implying that she had claimed that Islamic atrocities against women didn’t exist.

[break for quotations]
Quoting: “You've got eight posts a day on the general forum to repost my supposed defences of Islamic atrocities to women.”
“You won't do it because they don't exist”

“Talking of specifics...show us the posts where I defend "any" Islamic atrocities?
”That's not difficult if they exist, surely. Your problem is that they don't exist.”
[break for end of quotations]

Because of its ambiguity (“they don’t exist” refers to defences of Islamic atrocities against women, not to the atrocities themselves) I fastened on the second meaning, not the first. My regret is mild, falling way short of apology, because I have never seen any concern from this poster about the openly declared war of Islam against the natural rights of humanity cherished by the vast majority of the post-Enlightenment world, especially after bearing the hideous cost of protecting these rights against German and Jap aggression. I referred to the especially disgusting anti-female front of Islam's global attack against all of us in my earlier post.

I do not refer Poirot or anyone else to any videos. Arguments are written down - videos are performances.

EJ: I do not refer Poirot or anyone else to any videos. Arguments are written down - videos are performances.

My reason for posting videos is for when someone eg; Poirot, Arjay, & any other mossie lovers here ask for proof of atrocities, I can provide it in the form of a video or their own Koran. Usually of their Learned Imams preaching "for" the very thing that these posters say don't exist. When the proofs are provided they refuse to look at them because, they know, they have been Gazumpt. That is, of course, when the diversions & deflections come out in force. Clearing throats & ahhhhhh's, then they disappear off that thread or refuse to answer any questions about that subject. Gawd, you'd think I was dealing with children or politicians. Ay.

Emperor Julian,

No problem....I put up those old posts of Jayb's to moi as an example of the sort of rhetoric he employs towards me. That also should furnish posters with a clue as to why I refuse to engage him on topic.

Jayb,

I don't think after all these years and my many posts that anyone could accuse me of not putting forth an opinion on myriad subjects.

My weakness is suspending debate occasionally to address posters like yourself who get their jollies from misrepesenting other posters. I tend to think that that sort of low-down behaviour isn't in the spirit of honourable debate and discussion.

Your sentence above: "My reason for posting videos is for when someone eg; Poirot, Arjay, & any other mossie lovers here ask for proof of atrocities, I can provide it in the form of a video or their own Koran." - gives an indication of the sort of rhetoric you employ to make your hollow points.

I have no connection with any Muslim people. My comments on this forum pertain to treating other humans fairly.

I understand that you have what appears to be a hysterical bee in your bonnet over the idea of Muslim immigration. That's your prerogative. I don't see why you need to slam fellow posters with entirely concocted accusations regarding their posting history on this site to further your arguments.

If you can't debate honestly - without getting down in the gutter - then you shouldn't complain when you get "bagged" for your efforts.

poirot: My comments on this forum pertain to treating other humans fairly.

That's why I went to the Reclaim Australia Rally.

Having to pay a fake Jizyah Tax in the form of Halal Fee is not treating all people fairly. Sharia Law does not treat all people equally & fairly, especially women. The Koran does not treat all people fairly, especially non-moslems.

Where do you stand on that?

poirot: I don't think after all these years and my many posts that anyone could accuse me of not putting forth an opinion on myriad subjects.

poirot: "...Covering for Islam by denying this seems to be on a level with covering up Nazi crimes by denial that they ever happened."

I do believe that was EmperorJulian, Friday, 10 April 2015. Not me.

You are attributing things to me that are not. is that something like, " when time and time again you have demonstrated to me that you make things up, attribute them to others and refuse to provide evidence of your fantasies."

Poirot: I've never specifically stated on OLO that I repudiate NAZI atrocities during WWII...or the ravages of Attila the Hun...or Caligula.