poirot: I didn't "say that" - it was part of an article I posted.

But, dear poirot, you posted the article to show what you believe to be true & to repudiate the claims of Reclaim Australia.

poirot: Why would I bother to address your concerns when you've proved to me in the past that you're content to make up whatever you please and falsely attribute it to fellow posters.

No, I don't make things up. I post videos of what is happening. Are you saying I make these up? Yes I did, even recently, requote the wrong person & apologized. Most of us have inadvertently done this on occasions no big deal.

Regarding the videos, poirot, are you ashamed of the moslems portrayed, or are you upset that they were caught out?

poirot: I couldn't give a toss about your stupid "questions".

Is that because I have proved my point & you're feeling caught out & ashamed? ;-) I only ask questions to find out how you really feel about things, & what you really believe & support? You rarely answer questions directly. You use the preferred tactics of a good moslem & use deflection to direct the conversation away from the original question.

paul1405: Another mossie supporter. They maybe a small bunch now, but as the number of moslems grows in Australia so their numbers will increase exponentially.

Poirot & paul1405, do you agree that these people should be deported as soon as possible so as not to contaminate the Moderate moslems?

JayB, which people are you referring to for deportation? What is the charge? Are they Australian citizens? These videos you are on about, I'll take a look, providing they are not of you in the bath tub with your rubber ducky! Where are they? I'm not searching!

Poirot, we might have to stop feeding the chooks on this thread, they are getting too fat on their own bigotry.

Paul,

Indeed....

He says:

".... I only ask questions to find out how you really feel about things, & what you really believe & support?..."

Here's "Jayb's style":

"It's strange, but poirot usually defends these practices by her Islamic friends.
Posted by Jayb, Friday, 20 June 2014 2:02:07 PM"

My reply:

"Jayb,

"It's strange, but poirot usually defends these practices by her Islamic friends."

Aside from Loudmouth deviating the domestic issue of SM's thread to his favourite "leftie donging weapon"...he at least keeps things relatively civil.

Show us your evidence, Jayb?

I mean - show us?

You've got eight posts a day on the general forum to repost my supposed defences of Islamic atrocities to women.

You won't do it because they don't exist - and you're one vacuous little man who mendaciously misrepresents your fellow poster whenever the opportunity arises.

It's easy to lie - and then scuttle out the door.

Most of us choose not to....
Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 21 June 2014 8:54:39 AM"

Jayb's response:

"poirot: my supposed defences of Islamic atrocities to women.

All your previous posts concerning atrocities committed in the defence of Islamic Sharia Law. Not specifically women.

poirot: you're one vacuous little man who mendaciously misrepresents your fellow poster whenever the opportunity arises.

No. I just like to keep some people honest. Also, when questioned on specifics like this your usual tactic is to deflect the question.
Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 21 June 2014 9:24:33 AM"

My reply:

"Jayb,

"All your previous posts concerning atrocities committed in the defence of Islamic Sharia Law. Not specifically women."

Okay...cough 'em up?

Talking of specifics...show us the posts where I defend "any" Islamic atrocities?

That's not difficult if they exist, surely.

Your problem is that they don't exist and you are being dishonest in your accusations.

Show us...

"No. I just like to keep some people honest. Also, when questioned on specifics like this your usual tactic is to deflect the question."

I'm not deviating here...I'm calling you out on your dishonesty.

Come on...produce the goods.
Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 21 June 2014 10:13:33 AM"

Who could be bothered debating that kind of dishonesty....

Paul1405: JayB, which people are you referring to for deportation? What is the charge?

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=345183559016883&set=vb.237357993132774&type=2&theater
http://concit.org/australia-under-islam-in-25-years-islamic-constitution-of-australia/

The Charge. Treason. Inciting Violence. & Racist.

Poirot: Your problem is that they don't exist and you are being dishonest in your accusations.

Are you saying you haven’t supported anything Islamic? I’m dam sure you have over the last few years. Mostly by refusing to answer the question & deflecting the question off to another unrelated argument. That is tacit support. You really haven’t got the guts to answer any question directly, ever.

You have refused to answer the questions I have put recently. As in you reply;

Poirot: I couldn't give a toss about your stupid "questions".
9 April 2015

You deflect any questions given to you by anyone. That’s why you can say

Poirot: I don't debate posters who invent things to support their agenda.

Are you saying I invented the above two videos? I have shown you a myriad of videos over the past years & asked for your comments. Nothing has been answered directly by you. Always, with the, “I couldn't give a toss about your stupid "questions".” Nice Islamic debating style. Must be feeling guilty.

You get eight posts? I only get four, what's going on?

Jayb,

The reason I've chosen not to engage you "on subject" is because of my prior experience in you accusing me of posting specific things - which I've not posted.

When requested to provide evidence for your claims, you are the one who has "deviated" blathering something about them all being somewhere or other....etc, etc.

Now you're mumbling in your boots about me providing "tacit" support for all the "nasties" because I refuse to condemn Islamic people from fleeing war zones and being afforded the right to live in peace if they have been deemed to have refugee status.

Again I ask - why would I interact with you "on subject" when time and time again you have demonstrated to me that you make things up, attribute them to others and refuse to provide evidence of your fantasies.

There's no requirement to answer questions just because somebody on here asks them - just as there's no obligation to view videos just because someone links to them...especially if that someone has proven disingenuous in previous dealings.

Btw...you do get eight posts a day per thread in the "General" section of the forum - you get four posts a day per thread in the Articles section.