I have been wondering why they picked on Harris. There must be just so many more even higher profile celebrities, lawyers, judges, politicians etc who'd offer even more interesting exposure than him ?
I can't help thinking that it was because of his nice bloke image that they came down on him so heavily. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's only been a "groper" or similar. Have they picked him to take the pressure off some of the pillars of our society ? I just can't help thinking that this is the case. You know the real penetrators. I can smell a Rat here.

INDY/quote..<<.,I have been wondering/why they picked on Harris.>

once/you\fall-out/of favour
or/the counter-dirty person you got the/dirt on dies
[WE/KNOW-FOR/SURE;.there are many more[like last years there was a huge list]........and he is the only one[and they didnt need persue/the porn/link.

its a big issue/indy/but your to forgiving
[as far as god is concerned/he neveR ALLOWS/a bigger burden/then we can bare.//.[the innocent cant come/here\.plus we ech/got\a life-previeuw/and bought the ticket[got our life in sentience

[i noted on the street.and at nimbin[everyone/there had early awaken

<<./There must be just so many more/even higher profile celebrities>

mATE/ITS NEAR ALL OF EM/but.as i said/only when they get like clinton/or that bbc jerk[or like dikk cheecky/who shoots lawyers/hge dont agree with

<<>,lawyers,judges,politicians/sports-heroes.
girlguides.priests[wherer kids/are.its a moving feast[that kid/with
the old folks it was one in four/get molesterd
now its near one to one[two to one[at bst]

the red shirt/KID/Ihad 400 perverts withn 100 mile radius
e

<<>who'd offer even more/interesting exposure\than him/HARRIS>>?
PLENTYBELISCONE/FRENCHIE/THAT BANK PRESIDENT/THE CANADIANPM/THE LIST IS ENDLESS

ANYONE WANT TO/BUY ORGAN/TO ORDER??
satans realm/is really sick

<<>>Correct me if I'm wrong>

you are

<>>but I think he's only\..what/ibeen a "groper">>
a fat oppertuity/fish?f\he hugged/you
and licked/hids finger/and shuved-it/where te sun dont shine
better or worse that me/isnt an excuse
its not a rating/

they picked him to take the pressure off some
of the pillars of our society

<<>You know the real penetrators.>>>..
we all/see\them..on\tv/everynight
ask/why/they only convicted/the lackeys[murdocs mates got off/cause via secret recordings/ya get all the dirt/

suspende sentance/he can be bought

</I can smell a Rat here...>>
be carefull/mate\they got your dirt/too[no secrets/means\just that

no secrets*]full-stop[*

Individual,

It's possibly not really worth my time and trouble at this stage of the proceedings, but since you're still defending Rolf and attempting any line of mitigation for his "crimes, I'll take you up on your offer.

"....Correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's only been a "groper" or similar...."

You are wrong...and I'm happy to correct you.

Read this:

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/sentencing-remarks-mr-j-sweeney-r-v-harris1.pdf

Contained in it are all the grizzly details of Harris's predation and his sexual abuse of one teenager in particular. I can't post the pertinent passages here because they are quite graphic - you'll have to read them for yourself.

(Other posters on this thread made themselves aware of the detail - why haven't you before now?)

(Hint: - they go way beyond "groping")

Even this ABC News article contains this warning:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-05/rolf-harris-trial-reporting-downfall-of-childhood-hero/5574350

"Read Justice Nigel Sweeney's sentencing of Rolf Harris in full - WARNING: CONTAINS EXTREMELY GRAPHIC CONTENT"

Will be waiting patiently for your next spiel attempting to paint this predator as "hard done by".

Poirot,
Are you stupid ? How many more times do I have to tell you I'm not defending Harris ? Are you so thick that you can't read anything as it is meant. Why don't you just give up wasting our time here.

individual,

Okay mate....gloves off.

I have possibly been mistaken that you have been defending Harris's depraved behaviour because you were being purposely belligerent.

I've now come to the conclusion that you really are "thick".

The judge's sentencing remarks have been up on this thread now for a day or so, and I have been urging fellow posters to read them because it squashes any doubt that Harris was merely a "playful groper" and has been unduly slammed by the establishment.

Ludwig read them...and he now understands why they went after Harris.

You, on the other hand, have sailed merrily along ignoring the detail of the case - detail that we were not all privy to during the trial. You haven't sought to apprise yourself of the gory detail of what Harris perpetrated against his daughter's friend serially and over many years. Anyone who read it would feel disgust.

Have you read it - are you going to?

And then you toodle along here after 104 posts and say ".......Correct me if I'm wrong but I think he's only been a "groper" or similar...."

Pathetic!

You say to me "Are you stupid?"

One of us is...but I suspect it ain't me.

Indi, you can't be that stupid, after all you can tap on a keyboard and post your drivel. read the links Poirot has provided and then tell us it just "a bit of groping".

Poirot, Indi must be getting some perverse pleasure geeing you up with his crap. But then again he does claim to have "mates" up there in the wilds of North Queensland who do the same sort of thing as Harris and everyone in that neck of the woods thinks its all okay.
Indi, if you have such "mates" they certainly are a strange bunch indeed, you included. Take some advice, I would suggest you get some new "mates" as well. After all your known by the company you keep!