How rude of you TarynW. My name was clearly at the top of your last post and, this being a place of public opinion, not private, I shall respond to whatever I wish thankyou.

You clearly do not listen. Pale's website is stilled linked as a member of OLO. Being a member does not make them ammune to the rules.

Clearly, your friend has done the wrong thing or this action would not have been taken.

As for what was said about you and your baby, I am starting to think it is an exaggertation now on your behalf?

If this ges to court I will be there. My husbands happy for me to post on this thread but not the other because of the discusting things Graham said was ok . You know this goes on googles.
Wendy wont be happy when she finds out I am trying to tell people the truth because she told me to leave it.

I cant. I just cant Robert. Its so bloody unfair. She has very little funds and put the membership in only to help him. Look how shes been treated. My God Whats wrong with everybody.
All this woman tried to do was help Animals.

Thats Her Crime!

Why am I the only one speaking out.

You cant take eleven hundred dollars off a person then refuse the provide a service. Within hours!or return their money.
Think about it.
Just look at the discusting! remarks that are still up!. Look at the posts from pig farmer saying wendys a lyer and pale are not in conjunction with RSPCA QLD.
I cant understand this guy. He himself posted that he! rang the RSPCA QLD and He posted > That is the end of this Wendy does work with RSPCA QLD. Then he allows a non member to go on defaming an organisation! by saying Wendys a lyer and dont have anything to do with the organisation. They have no right to use that name etc.
Whats going on?
I think Wendy should talk with the fraud squad personally.

Pisces
You were not involved. I am not rude I just strongly suspect you are using another name. If you did not see the comment about myself and one week old baby then you cant comment can you. My husband contacted our lawyers and the Minister for Cominications about it. They dont think its a little matter. So our family will leave it to them. They have passed it on to the correct authoritys.
As I cant seem to get it through your head I am talking to Cilia and Robert you may post to me all you like but I wont be answering you.
If I am right about your true ID you wrote in support of the crude comments and in fact! added a few yourself. Dont you know the rules about using several names. Give me eleven hundred dollars and I might tell you.

TarynW
This is how you respond to someone that does not agree with you? Personal attack?

You and your friend may be accused of using mutliple identities, but do not put me in that same catagory.

I do not know what was said about you on another thread and have not commented on it. Cant see how it would be a matter for the courts if OLO refused to delete it. Cant be all that bad.

I am starting to see why someone would say unpleasant things about you.

"You cant take eleven hundred dollars off a person then refuse the provide a service"

Hello!

The service is still being provided, how many times do you have to be told before you take a look for yourself.

Hello
He told Steve to take off her name and put the organisations name up. Steve did that. She paid the money. When she posted in the organisations name he banned her for using another name. Hello!
Your the one who does not read.
Cilvia already knows the truth so I was really just telling Robert.
The fact the remarks were left up about myself and baby say a lot. Although I requested they were deleted as did my husband they remain still to this day.
You keep saying she can use this service. That is not correct. I told you he banned her saying she had used two different names. Hello. Remember now I was there. You were not.
You cant take eleven hundred dollars off a organisation then ban their use.
You really need to get the facts straight .
So if they cant use the service because they followed his! directions then he should at least return the money. Either that or apologise for what is clearly his mistake and provide the service they paid for. I dont even know that they would wish to continue to use it after the discusting posts that he refused to delete. That would be up to her.
The Ministers office are not too pleased about it I will let you in on that much.
Go back and just take a look. Cilivia is right. It was discusting.

You will have to direct me to the thread you are talking about before I can "go back and take a look".

My understanding of OLO membership is that it entitles you to a 12 month link to your website from their members section. Pale has that service, listed under institutions.

As far as posting goes, you would be on the same level as the rest of us and subject to the same rules. I see two different issues here, one does not automatically go with the other. Posting is a free service and if you break the rules, you're out. Now you say wendy was banned for using two names, the original arguement was because she posted something that was banned and it seems noone got to see it. Therefore, none of us can say if she deserved that action or not. Only Wendy and Graham would know that.

I know, you say you were there and saw and heard everything, but we were not. The post she was banned for cannot be reposted without someone else getting banned, so we will never know.

As far as I can see, Pale has membership here and thats what was paid for. Being banned from posting for bad behaviour is irrelevant, she still has the service provided as far as the link to her site.