PLEASE GUYS I POSTED 22 LINKS
ONE SURE HAS UPSET YOU..tell me which one
hoipe its the anne frank one..cause i lived as if that book was true for years/that led to the nose job movie lot..heck im not sure whats got ya all so upset

post info what link
what bit specifically..i can read minds//but which ones
how about explaining..what ya think?

I THOUGHT IT MIGHT BE JEW WATCH..but i know most of that is true
the point really is gentlemen..if arabs are ruling the world/how come jewish people rule over everything else.

there is nothing worse that the winner claiming the under guy
its sad its just pathetic..you know who own this realm..and it sure aint no prisoner in gulag/gazza.

And the russion thing.so much ignored
in this rush to call a spade a spade..multicultural..is rubbish when they sell us the American dream..and the perfect and less than prefect..of men.the big guy dont need to hit first

but the truth is one has raused it to an art
and when they turn against you in unison..thats a clear sign
[funny enough mossad has its policy..to hold both sides of the debate

we are seeing the patterns.a little too LATE
IDF YA THINK THE KIDS GO TO WAR ZONE ARNT THE SALF SAME OCCUPATION FORCES//GLOBAlly..in syria and ukraine..funny enough doth supported by usa/run by the mossad

Steele,
No he has a point but he's expressed it in a long winded and convoluted fashion, Jewish radicals have cried wolf so many times and faked so many of these "attacks" that nobody believes these stories of vandalism and intimidation against minority groups.
On past precedent it's more than likely that someone associated with the Mosque or with a local Anti Racist group carried out the graffiti attacks. Examples from the U.S:
http://themattwalshblog.com/2013/12/06/the-fake-hate-crime-epidemic/
One from Australia, a skinny 17 year old is hit repeatedly with baseball bats by two men but didn't need medical attention afterwards?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/news/teenager-bashed-in-anti-semitic-attack/story-e6frg6of-1111114221846
Carnita Matthews fake "racism" case:
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/judge-could-not-be-sure-who-was-behind-the-veil/story-e6freuy9-1226078801032
From Nashville:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/02/nashville-muslims-need-to-get-their-stories-straight-about-hate-crime-at-mosque

A Crisis Actor is a person, often with some acting training who is selected or who steps forward to be the face of a particular newsworthy event to which they are connected, being amateurs though they usually stuff it up and end up being so tangled in their own lies that they can't get out of the predicament.
Robbie Parker from Sandy Hook:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKr-av9jVx8
This technique of media manipulation is probably as old as the hills but shysters like Steven Spielberg and Claude Lanzmann elevated it to high farce in recent decades:
Dario Gabbai, the fake Auschwitz Sonderkommando:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk1yzjnapWw
Paul Parks and the fake Dachau liberation narrative:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Dachau/BostonGlobe131000.html

We plant children; we grow power.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm
Rule by Adjective

The violence of the government can create nothing, so all we can do is manipulate language. This is called the "rule by adjective," or RBA.

RBA essentially consists of the creation of noble sounding phrases that completely disintegrate under the slightest rational or empirical examination. The goal is to use wording that sounds like the tagline of a B-grade action movie, but with flags.

A few examples we are particularly proud of:

· "Building a bridge to the 21st century."

· "[Insert country here] has a date with destiny."

· "No dream is beyond our reach."

· "We're one people bound together by a common set of ideas."

· "Let's celebrate our diversity."

In crafting political language, it's essential to play upon personal relationships, and pretend that the farmers and the sheep are all one big happy family, and that anyone who expresses skepticism or disagreements is not a "team player," and does not want to achieve anything noble or great or good or unselfish. For example:

· "There may be naysayers among us who say that we cannot achieve these great things together, but I say that history will prove them wrong, that the spirit of creativity and unity still lives within our people, and that the final chapter of our civilization has yet to be written!" etc etc.

Notice that no substantial criticism is ever addressed - rather, sly slander is continually layered over the objection until whoever objects is just kind of disliked. (This trick is continually reinforced in movies, where all the bad guys are unlikable, and all the good guys likable, which as anyone who has ever read Socrates knows, is almost always the complete opposite of the truth.)

Now that you have achieved the summit of political power, it is also essential that you project calm, confidence, serenity, and all the other characteristics that are completely inappropriate to the imminent disasters awaiting the tax cattle.

http://board.freedomainradio.com/page/books/the_handbook_of_human_ownership_a_manual_for_new_tax_farmers.html
http://rss.infowars.com/20140420_Sun_Alex.mp3

http://whatreallyhappened.com/node

Jay Of Melbourne,

This link of yours is *GOLD*:
<<Carnita Matthews fake "racism" case -http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/judge-could-not-be-sure-who-was-behind-the-veil/story-e6freuy9-1226078801032>>

Frankly I had forgotten all about it. But it is especially pertinent for this thread because Carnita Matthews was one of Steeles early anti-harassment/ anti-racist icons. And if I remember correctly he refused to condemn her actions.


I was going to suggest it should be made compulsory viewing for all wantabe anti-racism advocates --but on second thoughts it would be like water off a ducks back, they would NOT take it in.

Foxy,
Just to remind you of your sweeping statements regarding Aussie racism.

You could show proof or admit you were misleading the readers of OLO.

Dear Individual,

It's up to you to provide proof for your
sweeping generalisations and statements.
Not anyone else - as any good debater knows.

Posted by Foxy, Monday, 21 April 2014 2:42:27 P

Dear Banjo,

You're really grabing at straws.
I didn't ask anybody to provide
proof of what I had stated.
Individual did of Poirot however, hence
my reply to him. You need to give the
context of things and not be selective
when citing somebody else's comments.
Bad man!