This from the article:
>>The goal of Islam is not to peacefully coexist but to eventually implement the Shari’a worldwide.<<

This from the Quran:
>>Those who believe and those who are Jewish or Christian and the Sabians-any who believe in Allah and the last days, and work righteousness shall have their reward with their lord-on them shall be no fear. (Qaran 2:62)<<

From the Qaran we have an ecumenical statement of brotherhood for all who believe in the god of Abraham……..but their Mufti’s don’t preach this, they preach conquest and division and we let them………

Idiot Caucasians we defend everybody’s rights except our own….but that is the agenda of political and social engineering in the first world.

For those who are so deeply concerned about
Muslims and their "lack" of integration in this
country of ours perhaps the following link may
be of help:

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2013/12/13/comment-changing-our-view-muslim-australia

See you on another thread.

FOXY...its not their fault
ITS SORT OF EXPLAINED Here..in the last 1/4..OF THE HOUR
[3/4's..tO 2/3 RD the way through..its sad..THEY CAN'T REALIZE..IT..
in themselves,,/the ones who need TO DIVIDE US TO RULE..[LORD IT OVER us]

IT begins with us..BEING BETTER THAN THEM*
[or bigger/or moRe powerful/or i got A GUN..OR KIDDY Stuff most of us left behind in school/BUT THOSE frighted by the bullies/now love bullying..Now they found OUT HOw..now.

ONCE IN THE CLAN..ALLWAYS IN THE Clan
you can get in anytime you waNT
[BUT YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE/NOR TELL OF ITS SECRETS[OR ACCIDENTS HAPPEN

FIGHT
OR FLIGH
HT..MEANS WE CHOSE..one of the other
IF ONE DONT WORK..WE TRY THE OTHER

http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Rivero/2014/02/Rivero_2_022014_140003.mp3

Dear Johan (OUG),

Thanks for that.

I'll see you on another discussion.

This one for me has now run its course.

Take care.

Foxy,

Not so fast.

Earlier you claimed that a book by journalist Marvine Howe 'proved' from examples taken from Spain and Portugal that Muslims 'integrate' well. You implied that Australians haven't got it right and would be blameworthy themselves if Muslims didn't integrate well in Australia.

As you realise, it is easy and usually safe for you to do your Left cultural cringe act using cherry-picked 'examples' and blame Australians for objecting to foul introduced violence and noxious cultural practices that challenge Australian law, because it is very unlikely that anyone would ever find the book you cited, or find the relevant paragraphs that you never cite.

However in the case of your preferred author, what you woulkd like Australians to think is challenged by the author herself who is also on record for observing that 'conservative' Islam that dominates in Turkey 'brutally suppressed' a humble environmental protest,

"My visit and the interview were overshadowed by the explosion of discontent against the democratically elected conservative Islamic government. What should have been a local town-planning issue easily resolved by compromise was brutally suppressed by riot police. The excessive use of force served to galvanize secular critics on the left and right and an apolitical youth against what was seen as an increasingly authoritarian government, determined to impose an Islamic agenda on the deeply rooted secular state."
http://www.mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/turkey-today-headscarves-and-womens-rights?print

I'm sure you'd find that worth reading.

As for those who claim to be on the side of good, wearing 'rose coloured' glasses that see good in endless 'diversity', the fact that they never demand diversity for nations like Japan indicates that they are simply out to dilute and destroy the Australian culture and traditions that they are embarrassed by and reject. Further proof lies in their rejection that there is any worthwhile Aussie culture, traditions and values worth keeping. Strange how those 'rose coloured glasses' do not correct a far Left jaundiced view of Australian culture and traditions.

Criticism of Muslims and Islam is not by definition (as you would have it) wrong, it is freedom of speech. See here,

onthebeach, Friday,21February2014,1:30:22,PM

Hi FOXY...

I'm very disappointed that you sought NOT to acknowledge my last thread which was specifically addressed to you, and ONE UNDER GOD. In one of your previous threads you mentioned 'rose coloured glasses', I do wonder who it is that views this issue through those very same glasses ?