The Forum > General Discussion > Do we ban the religion, or just wait for the inevitable to happen here.
Do we ban the religion, or just wait for the inevitable to happen here.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Page 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- ...
- 67
- 68
- 69
-
- All
Posted by david f, Friday, 22 November 2013 3:30:09 PM
| |
Danielle,
The thread has moved on and I do not want to divert it from its course, however you are right about the number of temporary visas for Muslim nurses and likely the number obtaining citizenship thereafter. Foxy's remarks are still wrong and offensive on two counts. First, Foxy was obviously partisan and wrong to claim, "The current health care agencies due to Mr Abbott's axe cuts probably could not afford to hire the "white" staff you speak of", when it occurred under Labor's watch, PM Julia Watshername and her Greens sidekicks, and under Kevin Rudd. Secondly, Foxy was condescending and wrong (her cultural cringe again) to accept and repeat that the Muslim nurses are somehow better and accept lower pay than her disliked 'whites', who apparently are not as good according to Foxy's preferred anecdotal source and expect Award conditions (shock, horror!). Just adding to the last, Foxy might welcome the lower nursing pay and conditions through immigration of Asian nurses, saying, "We need to be grateful that we have caring people who are able to work for lower wages.." and the previous Labor government strongly facilitated the policy. It does not reflect too kindly on Julia Wahtshername though, who Foxy puts on a pedestal. More of Julia's lies: in fact it now appears that she was active in undermining the employment rights, conditions and pay in an industry that is almost completely female. The education and training policies of the previous Labor governments must have been abject failures if our own nursing graduates cannot find work, requiring hundreds of Muslim nurses to be imported instead. As with any government policy I don't especially care what it is or what money is spent, as long as the electorate and those most affected are properly consulted, ie., directly consulted, not decisions taken behind closed doors. I am not aware of Kevin Rudd or Julia Wahtshername ever mentioning to the electorate or being up-front with nurses that they intended to warp their employment conditions (as Foxy has applauded!). Labor and their Greens sidekicks pose as the protectors of workers. Yeah, right!(sic) Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 22 November 2013 4:35:03 PM
| |
Hi Davidf,
<<The Holocaust where 6,000,000 were slaughtered because they were Jews was fueled by centuries of Christian hatred. I know of nothing that Islam has done that approaches the magnitude of that crime>> The Muslim conquest and attempted conversion of India produced a genocide on a scale many times larger than the Jewish holocaust. “From the time when Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, remarks Alain Danielou, the history of India becomes a long monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the Barbarians have destroyed civilisations, wiped-out entire races. Mahmoud Ghazni, continues Danielou, was an early example of Muslim ruthlessness, burning in 1018 of the temples of Mathura, razing Kanauj to the ground and destroying the famous temple of Somnath, sacred to all Hindus. His successors were as ruthless as Ghazini: in 103O the holy city of Benares was razed to the ground, its marvelous temples destroyed, its magnificent palaces wrecked. Indeed, the Muslim policy “vis à vis” India, concludes Danielou, seems to have been a conscious systematic destruction of everything that was beautiful, holy, refined”. http://francoisgautier.me/2013/08/23/the-muslims-invasions-of-india/ “Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty." [Dr. Koenraad Elst:“Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?] (Koenard Elst estimates 80 million Hindus were killed in the total jihad against India.) "the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history." [American historian, Will Durant] Posted by SPQR, Friday, 22 November 2013 4:51:44 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
I need to correct the poster known as "on the beach" he's once again attributing things to me that I neither said nor think. And, as I stated in my earlier post the information that I gave earlier was from the Blue-Cross Organisation (one of the largest in Victoria) and their policies in the hiring of their staff. The Director was being very frank and open. I am not against any "white" staff, nor do I place any politician on a pedestal. Although I do criticise the ones I feel could do better. And that's my right as a citizen and a voter in a democratic society Posted by Foxy, Friday, 22 November 2013 5:55:32 PM
| |
otb,
Kindly back up your statements and accusations against me with facts and indicate to us all where I have done what you accuse me of. As Belly once told you, "you invent my thoughts and then slander me with that invention." So I will (quoting Belly again), "Post what you wish but please do not in your blind and rude fashion refer to me." Your behaviour towards me on this forum comes under the heading of cyber-bullying and you can be legally held to account. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 22 November 2013 6:07:49 PM
| |
SPQR,
You are correct about the genocide of Hindus which was over a considerable period, thirteen centuries. There is one great difference though. The Nazi pogrom against Jews was not a war, where Jews could even defend themselves ... and very rarely escape. The numbers killed were over a relatively short period. Before WWII Germany was considered the most cultured and civilised country in Europe ... . and we are only looking at 70 years ago. The nazis employed a very efficient bureaucratic machine to identify Jews. They even knew the number of Jews in Albania. Many people were arrested and taken to the gas chambers unaware that they had a Jewish grandparent. I do not know the numbers of Jews killed over the centuries of Christian rule. But pogroms were frequent and bloody, add to this the regular propaganda, such as Jews were responsible for the plague - and the effect of this upon communities. Then there was the very restrictive lives imposed upon Jews, who were considered pariahs of society. I personally knew a Pole, who admitted that he and his friends would regularly enter Jewish communities to attack them; any death was of no consequence. Certainly the law had no concerns. This was only pre-war. Undoubtedly, this occurred in many areas outside of Poland. Posted by Danielle, Friday, 22 November 2013 6:11:47 PM
|
The Jews did not have the option of becoming Christians. Those who had become Christians were slaughtered by the Nazis anyway because of their ancestry.